HENSLEY, AKA HOSKINS

v.

KENTUCKY

Citator

Cited By (20 total)

• Giovanna Sinquin Walker v. State, 43 So. 3d 915 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010)
  …ced the rights of the accused by ‘affect[ing] or impugning] the integrity of the fact finding process’ at trial.” Hunter v. Samples, 15 F. 3d 1011, 1012 (11th Cir.1994) (quoting Seymore v. Alabama, 846 F. 2d 1355, 1359 (11th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1018, 109 S.Ct. 816, 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989)). Walker has also failed to demonstrate any error in the trial court’s handling of his speedy trial argument. “[T]he determination of whether a person has been deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy…
• Suter v. Artist M., 503 U.S. 347 (U.S. 1992)
  …” plaintiffs only raised a constitutional due process claim, which was dismissed by the District Court. See n. 2, supra. The Court of Appeals also noted that the Fourth Circuit, in L. J. ex rel. Dart v. Massinga, 838 F. 2d 118 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 1018 (1989), had found the substantive requirements listed in § 671(a) to be enforceable under § 1983. 917 F. 2d, at 988. Several cases have addressed the enforceability of various sections of the Adoption Act. See, e. g., Massinga, supra, at 123 (findi…
• United States v. Moody, 977 F.2d 1420 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …or impede, the due administration of justice....” We now join the majority of circuits in holding that § 1512 is not the exclusive vehicle for prosecution for witness tampering. United States v. Branch, 850 F. 2d 1080 (5th Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1018, 109 S.Ct. 816, 102 L.Ed.2d 806 (1989); United States v. Risken, 788 F. 2d 1361 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 923, 107 S.Ct. 329, 93 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); United States v. Rovetuso, 768 F. 2d 809 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1076, 106 S…