MARC A. JANNEY, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State of Fla. Dep't OF Transp. v. Plunske, 267 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
  …uires that “a copy of the notice of the hearing thereof shall be served a reasonable time before the time specified for the hearing.” (Emphasis supplied.) That concept of fairness and due process was well discussed in Prunty v. State, Fla.App. 1969, 226 So. 2d 448, “No rule is more firmly founded in the jurisprudence of this state than that it is a denial of due process of law to hold a hearing on a motion without notice to the parties involved in an adversary proceeding and to enter an order on the motion'…
• Shlishey THE Best, Inc. v. Citifinancial Equity Servs., Inc., 14 So. 3d 1271 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009)
  …h fair notice and a real opportunity to be heard ‘at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.’ ” (quoting Keys Citizens for Responsible Gov’t, Inc. v. Fla. Keys Aqueduct Auth., 795 So. 2d 940, 948 (Fla.2001))); Prunty v. State ex rel. Williams, 226 So. 2d 448, 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969) (holding that it is “a denial of due process” to “enter an order on the motion without first giving the parties affected notice and an opportunity to be heard before a party’s rights are taken away”). This court recently re…
• Seaboard Coast Line R.R. Co. & Robert J. Schmidt v. Art A. Magnuson, 288 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
  …to all parties. Cf., Mayflower Inv. Co. v. Brill, 1939, 137 Fla. 287, 188 So. 205; State Dept. of Transportation v. Plunske, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 337; Polland v. Visual Graphics Corp., Fla.App.1970, 240 So. 2d 835; Prunty v. State, Fla.App.1969, 226 So. 2d 448. We conclude that the error was harmless in view of the fact that the motion contained no matters [*304] which had not been argued previously to the court during the course of the trial. Affirmed. CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

• Hield v. State, 201 So. 2d 235 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967)
• Aranda v. State, 205 So. 2d 667 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968)