EASLEY
v.
ILLINOIS

U.S. | 1993-01-19
No. 92-6007
506 U.S. 1082 Supreme Court of the United States (1993) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Coley Quinn, 123 F.3d 1415 (11th Cir. 1997)
    …after giving the initial notice. Fed.R.Crim.P. 12.3(b) & 16(c). “[A] discovery violation does not automatically preclude the government’s use of the evidence at trial.” United States v. Accetturo, 966 F. 2d 631, 636 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1082, 113 S.Ct. 1053, 122 L.Ed.2d 360 (1993). Moreover, we will reverse a conviction based on the government’s violation of a discovery order only if the defendant has demonstrated that the violation “prejudiced his substantial rights.” United States v…
  • United States v. Bueno-Sierra, 99 F.3d 375 (11th Cir. 1996)
    …Port of Miami aboard the ship Lontue. Accordingly, their ability to defend against the importation charge was not compromised by the admission of the berth request. See United States v. Accetturo, 966 F. 2d 631, 636 (11th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1082, 113 S.Ct. 1053, 122 L.Ed.2d 360 (1993). 2. Failure to Correct Testimony Appellants claim that Heredia made several false statements in the course of his testimony that the government failed to correct. They correctly cite Napue v. Illinois, 360 U…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw