DON R. ORTEGA, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DON R. ORTEGA, JR., APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
230 So. 2d 177
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1970)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed. Harrington v. California, 1969, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284; Chapman v. California, 1969, 386 U.S. 18, 87 S.Ct. 824, 17 L.Ed.2d 705; State v. Youngblood, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 98; State v. Young, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 567; and State v. Galasso, Fla.1968, 217 So.2d 326.
WALDEN, REED and OWEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Keusch v. State, 261 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…nd no reversible error has been shown. The refusal to suppress evidence obtained upon the search was proper, based on evidence submitted at the hearing thereon. Carter [*205] v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So. 2d 324, 334; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So. 2d 177. Appellant’s contention of insufficiency of the evidence is found to be without merit. The judgment is affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (U.S. 1967)
- Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1969)
- State v. Young, 217 So. 2d 567 (Fla. 1968)
- State v. Youngblood, 217 So. 2d 98 (Fla. 1968)
- State v. Galasso, 217 So. 2d 326 (Fla. 1968)