RUSSELL H. KEUSCH, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1972-03-07
No. 71-680
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-
261 So. 2d 204 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant was convicted by verdict of a jury of buying, receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property (34,000 pounds of beef). Upon consideration of the contentions presented on appeal by the defendant, in the light of the record, briefs and arguments, we find no reversible error has been shown. The refusal to suppress evidence obtained upon the search was proper, based on evidence submitted at the hearing thereon. Carter *205v. State, Fla.App.1967, 199 So.2d 324, 334; Brown v. State, Fla.App.1970, 230 So.2d 177. Appellant’s contention of insufficiency of the evidence is found to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Keusch v. State, 267 So. 2d 656 (Fla. 1972)
    …Certiorari denied. 261 So. 2d 204. ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD and DEKLE, JJ., concur. McCAIN, J., dissents.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw