CHANDLER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Coley Quinn, 123 F.3d 1415 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …3. Quinn next challenges the constitutionality of the crack cocaine penalties. We review de novo a district court’s conclusion that a sentencing statute is constitutional. United States v. Byse, 28 F. 3d 1165, 1167 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1097, 115 S.Ct. 767, 130 L.Ed.2d 663 (1995). Quinn first contends that the crack cocaine penalties are cruel and unusual, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. This Circuit has rejected such a claim. See United States v. Solomon, 848 F. 2d 156, 157 (1…
• E.K. Hall, Sr. v. Holder, 117 F.3d 1222 (11th Cir. 1997)
  …ply do not view it as dispositive. .See also McCleskey v. Kemp, 481 U.S. 279, 298 n. 20, 107 S.Ct. 1756, 1770 n. 20, 95 L.Ed.2d 262 (1987) (applying Arlington Heights); United States v. Byse, 28 F. 3d 1165, 1169 (11th Cir.1994) (same), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 1097, 115 S.Ct. 767, 130 L.Ed.2d 663 (1995). . The district court considered both a § 2 claim and a constitutional claim. The evidence relevant to determining whether a discriminatory impact exists under § 2 overlaps substantially with the evidence dee…