WILLIAMS
v.
UNITED STATES
WILLIAMS
UNITED STATES
516 U.S. 826
Supreme Court of the United States (1995)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Trujillo, 146 F.3d 838 (11th Cir. 1998)…f the Eleventh Circuit, Pattern Jury Instructions (Criminal Cases), Trial Instruction n. 6 (West 1997); Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896); United States v. Chigbo, 38 F. 3d 543, 544-45 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 826, 116 S.Ct. 92, 133 L.Ed.2d 48 (1995). Four days later, the jury convicted Trujillo on the remaining two counts, convicted Fuentes on the third count and could not reach a verdict as to Ruiz. Trujillo and Fuentes argue that the district court erred…
-
United States v. Dickerson, 248 F.3d 1036 (11th Cir. 2001)…previously have upheld the language employed in the Allen charge given here, see Trujillo, 146 F. 3d at 846-47, even when used in conjunction with a polling of jurors. See United States v. Chigbo, 38 F. 3d 543, 545-46 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 826, 116 S.Ct. 92, 133 L.Ed.2d 48 (1995). Dickerson specifically challenges the reference to the costs of a trial, the impact of the charge upon jurors in the minority, and the timing of the jury’s decision after hearing the Allen charge. In United St…
-
McKensley v. United States, 518 U.S. 1038 (U.S. 1996)…[*1038] 516 U. S. 826; 517 U. S. 1135; 517 U. S. 1189; [*1039] No. 95-1551. No. 95-1555. No. 95-1578. No. 95-1640. No. 95-7022. No. 95-7041. No. 95-7081. No. 95-7145. No. 95-7182. No. 95-7505. No. 95-7663. No. 95-7816. No. 95-7946. No. 95-7983. No. 95-8017. No. 95-8082.…