WILLIAMS
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1995-10-02
No. 94-8967
516 U.S. 826 Supreme Court of the United States (1995) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Trujillo, 146 F.3d 838 (11th Cir. 1998)
    …f the Eleventh Circuit, Pattern Jury Instructions (Criminal Cases), Trial Instruction n. 6 (West 1997); Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492, 17 S.Ct. 154, 41 L.Ed. 528 (1896); United States v. Chigbo, 38 F. 3d 543, 544-45 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 826, 116 S.Ct. 92, 133 L.Ed.2d 48 (1995). Four days later, the jury convicted Trujillo on the remaining two counts, convicted Fuentes on the third count and could not reach a verdict as to Ruiz. Trujillo and Fuentes argue that the district court erred…
  • United States v. Dickerson, 248 F.3d 1036 (11th Cir. 2001)
    …previously have upheld the language employed in the Allen charge given here, see Trujillo, 146 F. 3d at 846-47, even when used in conjunction with a polling of jurors. See United States v. Chigbo, 38 F. 3d 543, 545-46 (11th Cir.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 826, 116 S.Ct. 92, 133 L.Ed.2d 48 (1995). Dickerson specifically challenges the reference to the costs of a trial, the impact of the charge upon jurors in the minority, and the timing of the jury’s decision after hearing the Allen charge. In United St…
  • McKensley v. United States, 518 U.S. 1038 (U.S. 1996)
    …[*1038] 516 U. S. 826; 517 U. S. 1135; 517 U. S. 1189; [*1039] No. 95-1551. No. 95-1555. No. 95-1578. No. 95-1640. No. 95-7022. No. 95-7041. No. 95-7081. No. 95-7145. No. 95-7182. No. 95-7505. No. 95-7663. No. 95-7816. No. 95-7946. No. 95-7983. No. 95-8017. No. 95-8082.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw