MCKENSLEY
v.
UNITED STATES; JACOBS V. KERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT; PETITTE BROTHERS MINING CO., INC., ET AL. V. CONNORS, TRUSTEE, UNITED MINE WORKERS OF AMERICA 1950 PENSION PLAN, ET AL.; HINCHLIFFE ET UX. V. FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION ET AL.; CONNOR V. FLYNN; KELLY V. PENSON; ANDERSON V. SHARMA ET AL. (TWO JUDGMENTS); CAPERS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; CARPIO V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; CABILES V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; ISLA V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; MAGANTE V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; DAVIS V. MISSISSIPPI; AMOS V. ESMOR MANSFIELD, INC., ET AL.; ESCUSA V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PULIDO V. UNITED STATES; SMITH V. HERRING, WARDEN, ET AL.; BURRESS V. UNITARIAN-UNIVERSALIST SOCIETY OF SACRAMENTO, INC., ET AL.; CUDAL V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; ANDERSON V. DAVIS ET AL.; PAJE V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; SANDOVAL V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; TAYLOR V. HANKS, SUPERINTENDENT, WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE; DE GUZMAN V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; JEFFRESS V. SUTER, CLERK, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES; OKOLIE ET AL. V. RICHARDSON, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE; FABIAN V. SHADE; STITT V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; BUC-HANAN V. CALIFORNIA; GOLD V. MORRISON-KNUDSEN CO. ET AL.; SPYCHALA V. LEWIS, WARDEN, ET AL.; RODENBAUGH V. LEARY; PRIETO V. CRAWFORD ET AL., IN RE SPELLMAN, MCQUEEN V. MATA ET AL.; MCQUEEN V. TURNER ET AL.; MOOMCHI V. UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO ET AL.; ARTIS V. GARRAGHTY, WARDEN; LEVINE V. UNITED STATES ET AL.; JONES V. UNITED STATES; BOUNDS V. UNITED STATES; LEWIS V. CENTURY MORTGAGE CO. ET AL.; ALVAREZ V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; DEDES V. PAGE ET AL.; MCQUEEN V. CANNON ET AL.; WILLIAMS V. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD ET AL.; SCOTT V. MOYER, CHIEF JUSTICE, SUPREME COURT OF OHIO, ET AL., IN RE CROWDER, AYARS V. NEW JERSEY; TILLI V. VAN ANTWERPEN, JUDGE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.; TURNER V. CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.; TURNER V. ERVIN; TURNER V. KUYKENDALL; TURNER V. KUYKENDALL; AND TURNER V. AUGUSTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT ET AL., IN RE JAFFER, AMARILLE V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; CAMPBELL V. UNITED STATES, IN RE SISK, BAXTER V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA, IN RE BALLARD ET AL., IN RE LORENZ, PARRISH V. COLORADO ET AL.; ABAYAN V. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

U.S. | 1996-08-05
Nos. 94-9428; No. 95-1292; No. 95-1461; No. 95-1551; No. 95-1555; No. 95-1578; No. 95-1640; No. 95-7022; No. 95-7041; No. 95-7081; No. 95-7145; No. 95-7182; No. 95-7505; No. 95-7663; No. 95-7816; No. 95-7946; No. 95-7983; No. 95-8017; No. 95-8082; No. 95-8114; No. 95-8138; No. 95-8143; No. 95-8219; No. 95-8224; No. 95-8230; No. 95-8237; No. 95-8305; No. 95-8316; No. 95-8320; No. 95-8356; No. 95-8373; No. 95-8376; No. 95-8377; No. 95-8387; No. 95-8417; No. 95-8418; No. 95-8420; No. 95-8433; No. 95-8474; No. 95-8513; No. 95-8514; No. 95-8521; No. 95-8522; No. 95-8533; No. 95-8546; No. 95-8580; No. 95-8597; No. 95-8625; No. 95-8649; No. 95-8690; No. 95-8696; No. 95-8709; No. 95-8742; No. 95-8769; No. 95-8796; No. 95-8818; No. 95-8900; No. 95-8919; No. 95-8927; No. 95-9047
518 U.S. 1038 Supreme Court of the United States (1996)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court denied petitions for rehearing in a large consolidated docket of fifty-three separate cases involving diverse legal matters, including federal employment, criminal justice, property disputes, and administrative agency decisions. No substantive opinion was issued, as the Court simply rejected requests to reconsider its prior dispositions of these cases.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

516 U. S. 826; 517 U. S. 1135; 517 U. S. 1189; No. 95-1551. No. 95-1555. No. 95-1578. No. 95-1640. No. 95-7022. No. 95-7041. No. 95-7081. No. 95-7145. No. 95-7182. No. 95-7505. No. 95-7663. No. 95-7816. No. 95-7946. No. 95-7983. No. 95-8017. No. 95-8082. No. 95-8114. No. 95-8138. No. 95-8143. No. 95-8219. No. 95-8224. No. 95-8230. No. 95-8237. No. 95-8305. 517 U. S. 1209; 517 U. S. 1210; 517 U. S. 1210; 517 U. S. 1234;

517 U. S. 1140; 517 U. S. 1192; 517 U. S. 1110; 517 U. S. 1142; 517 U. S. 1235; 517 U. S. 1159; 517 U. S. 1169; 517 U. S. 1172;

517 U. S. 1194; 517 U. S. 1194; 517 U. S. 1161; 517 U. S. 1212; No. 95-8316. No. 95-8320. No. 95-8356. No. 95-8373. No. 95-8376. No. 95-8377. No. 95-8387. No. 95-8417. No. 95-8418. No. 95-8420. No. 95-8433. No. 95-8474. No. 95-8513. No. 95-8514. No. 95-8521. No. 95-8522. No. 95-8533. No. 95-8546. No. 95-8580. No. 95-8597. No. 95-8625. No. 95-8649. No. 95-8690. No. 95-8696. No. 95-8709. No. 95-8742. 517 U. S. 1212; 517 U. S. 1212; 517 U. S. 1213;

517 U. S. 1219;

517 U. S. 1225; 517 U. S. 1225; 517 U. S. 1198; 517 U. S. 1198; 517 U. S. 1237; 517 U. S. 1226; 517 U. S. 1237; 517 U. S. 1247; 517 U. S. 1248; 517 U. S. 1226; 517 U. S. 1207; 517 U. S. 1227; 517 U. S. 1227; ante, p. 1010; ante, p. 1003; ante, p. 1010; No. 95-8769. No. 95-8796. No. 95-8818. No. 95-8900. No. 95-8919. No. 95-8927. No. 95-9047. 517 U. S. 1228; 517 U. S. 1219; 517 U. S. 1249; ante, p. 1016; 517 U. S. 1232; ante, p. 1011; and ante, p. 1012. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (64 total)

View all 64 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw