MERCER MCCLAIN FURR

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Stewart v. Boho, Inc., 493 So. 2d 95 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)
  …, the owner of premises open to the public owes his invitee a duty to warn of latent or concealed dangers which are known or should be known to the owner and not known to the invitee. Waterman v. Graham, 228 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970), cert. den. 237 So. 2d 538 (1970). Where the danger is obvious and apparent or the invitee otherwise has knowledge of the danger which is equal to or superior to the owner’s knowledge, the owner has no duty to warn of it. Pittman v. Volusia County, 380 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 5th D…
• Adan v. State, 453 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …intended neutral identification witness was unable to testify due to illness. It does not appear that any other “neutral” identification witness was available at the time of trial. See Furr v. State, 229 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969), cert. denied, 237 So. 2d 538 (Fla.1970). Furthermore, it is clear from the record that the sister’s identification testimony was not of such a nature as to evoke sympathy or prejudice the defendant. Welty. Accordingly, the admission of the identification testimony was not rever…
• Vandegrift v. Vandegrift, 477 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
  …an be sustained on this basis as well, whether the funds are deemed to be the wife’s “marital” income or not. See Scheidl v. Scheidl, 343 So. 2d 963 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Roffe v. Roffe; Green v. Green, 228 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) cert. denied, 237 So. 2d 538 (Fla.1970). LUMP SUM ALIMONY: EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION Assuming arguendo that the facts in this case do not justify the finding of a special equity, still this case can be affirmed, in my view, on the basis of the equitable distribution or lump sum…

Authorities Cited

• Mercer McClain Furr v. State, 229 So. 2d 269 (Fla. 2d DCA 1969)