SARATOGA FISHING CO.
v.
J. M. MARTINAC & CO. ET AL.; FROST ET AL. V. UNITED STATES; OCHOA V. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ET AL.; SWEENEY V. SCHMOKE, MAYOR OF BALTIMORE, ET AL.; HINCHLIFFE V. PENNSYLVANIA; TIN YAT CHIN V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE; ABIDEKUN V. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT ET AL.; DUTCHER V. MOREO ET AL.; FIDIS V. LAKESIDE MEDICAL CENTER; SORIA V. TEXAS; WILKINS V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; RODRIGUEZ V. UNITED STATES; TUERK V. OTIS ELEVATOR CO., INC., ET AL.; HALE V. RUNYON, POSTMASTER GENERAL; FELTROP V. BOWERSOX, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; ARTEAGA V. SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CLARA COUNTY; ARTEAGA V. COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT; MULTANI V. ROSS UNIVERSITY ET AL.; KEIRSEY V. MARYLAND; SACERIO V. SCHOOL BOARD OF DADE COUNTY; WERNER, AKA THOMAS V. MCCOTTER, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, UTAH DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; GARY V. TURPIN, WARDEN; HOWARD V. HOWARD; JUDD V. UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO ET AL.; LAMBERT V. INDIANA; REYNOLDS V. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN'S SERVICES; SIKORA V. DOE ET AL.; JENKINS ET AL. V. OAKLEY ET AL.; GRAY V. WOOD, SUPERINTENDENT, WASHINGTON STATE PENITENTIARY, ET AL.; HANSEN V. UNITED STATES; SHARP V. ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. ET AL.; BURGESS V. EASLEY MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMMISSION; NAGI V. C. E. FLEMING CORP. ET AL.; IN RE ROBINSON; TIDIK V. RITSEMA ET AL.; IN RE GRUBBS; BURNETT V. CHIPPEWA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; TROWBRIDGE V. UNITED STATES; STEWART V. UNITED STATES; WASHINGTON V. OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; DANCER V. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD

U.S. | 1997-08-04
Nos. 95-1764; No. 96-538; No. 96-1358; No. 96-1534; No. 96-1593; No. 96-1664; No. 96-1700; No. 96-6480; No. 96-7748; No. 96-7796; No. 96-7937; No. 96-7980; No. 96-8086; No. 96-8172; No. 96-8250; No. 96-8288; No. 96-8289; No. 96-8292; No. 96-8294; No. 96-8299; No. 96-8373; No. 96-8375; No. 96-8384; No. 96-8428; No. 96-8464; No. 96-8498; No. 96-8512; No. 96-8532; No. 96-8571; No. 96-8572; No. 96-8606; No. 96-8618; No. 96-8627; No. 96-8637; No. 96-8644; No. 96-8667; No. 96-8677; No. 96-8697; No. 96-8771; No. 96-8840; No. 96-8919
521 U.S. 1136 Supreme Court of the United States (1997)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court denied petitions for rehearing in thirty-nine cases involving diverse legal matters ranging from administrative appeals to constitutional challenges, collectively reported in volume 521 of the United States Reports.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

520 U. S. 875; 520 U. S. 1226; 520 U. S. 1229; 520 U. S. 1251; 520 U. S. 1265; 520 U. S. 1231; 520 U. S. 1241; No. 96-6480. No. 96-7748. No. 96-7796. No. 96-7937. No. 96-7980. No. 96-8086. No. 96-8172. No. 96-8250. No. 96-8288. No. 96-8289. No. 96-8292. No. 96-8294. No. 96-8299. No. 96-8373. No. 96-8375. No. 96-8384. No. 96-8428. No. 96-8464. No. 96-8498. No. 96-8512. No. 96-8532. No. 96-8571. No. 96-8572. No. 96-8606. 519 U. S. 1063; 520 U. S. 1171; 520 U. S. 1253; 520 U. S. 1189; 520 U. S. 1160; 520 U. S. 1214; 520 U. S. 1190; 520 U. S. 1242;

520 U. S. 1191; 520 U. S. 1242;

520 U. S. 1245; 520 U. S. 1255; 520 U. S. 1266; 520 U. S. 1256; 520 U. S. 1268; 520 U. S. 1222; 520 U. S. 1268; No. 96-8618. No. 96-8627. No. 96-8637. No. 96-8644. No. 96-8667. No. 96-8677. No. 96-8697. No. 96-8771. No. 96-8840. No. 96-8919.

520 U. S. 1273; 520 U. S. 1256; 520 U. S. 1227; 520 U. S. 1279; 520 U. S. 1235; 520 U. S. 1246; ante, p. 1124; and 520 U. S. 1280. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (59 total)

View all 59 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw