TOEGEMANN

v.

PROCHASKA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Johnson v. K Mart Corp., 273 F.3d 1035 (11th Cir. 2001)
  …t of the Supreme Court’s recent analysis in Robinson (holding that § 704(a) of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3(a), allows suit by former employees). See Cargill v. Turpin, 120 F. 3d 1366, 1386 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1080, 118 S.Ct. 1529, 140 L.Ed.2d 680 (1998) (“[O]nly the Supreme Court or this court sitting en banc can judicially overrule a prior panel decision”). Johnson’s entitlement to bring this action turns on the construction of a number of related sub-sect…
• Boree v. Comm'r OF the Internal Revenue Serv., 837 F.3d 1093 (11th Cir. 2016)
  …our Circuit’s laws. See, e.g., Cargill v. Turpin, 120 F. 3d 1366, 1386 (11th Cir.1997) ("The law of this circuit is 'emphatic' that only the Supreme Court or this court sitting en banc can judicially overrule a prior panel decision.”), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1080, 118 S.Ct. 1529, 140 L.Ed.2d 680 (1998). . Although Mri Boree testified at trial that he always intended to hold the property for investment and that his holding purpose never changed, he now argues that his purpose changed as a result of altered ci…
• New Jersey v. New York, 524 U.S. 968 (U.S. 1998)
  …68] 523 U. S. 767; ante, p. 88; ante, p. 926; 523 U. S. 696; 523 U. S. 740; 523 U. S. 1117; ante, p. 904; 523 U. S. 1137; 523 U. S. 1138; 523 U. S. 1122; 523 U. S. 1138; 523 U. S. 1138; 523 U. S. 1122; 522 U. S. 1032; 523 U. S. 1028; 523 U. S. 1061; 523 U. S. 1080; 523 U. S. 1080; 523 U. S. 1080; 523 U. S. 1063; [*969] No. 97-7883. No. 97-7945. No. 97-8082. No. 97-8123. No. 97-8186. No. 97-8202. No. 97-8235. No. 97-8240. No. 97-8244. No. 97-8263. No. 97-8304. No. 97-8341. No. 97-8358. No. 97-8379. No. 97-8385…

  ← 1 / 2 →