NEW JERSEY
v.
NEW YORK; HOPKINS, WARDEN V. REEVES; REEVES V. HOPKINS, WARDEN; MONTANA ET AL. V. CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS ET AL.; CALDERON, WARDEN, ET AL. V. ASHMUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; PROFESSIONAL PILOTS FEDERATION ET AL. V. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION; FALKENBERRY V. TAYLOR; DETERESA V. AMERICAN BROADCASTING COS., INC., ET AL.; BAYER V. STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE/MEDICAL CENTER ET AL.; GREENE V. CITIBANK, N. A., ET AL.; HINCHLIFFE ET AL. V. PRUDENTIAL HOME MORTGAGE CO., INC.; PHILLIPS ET AL. V. CITY OF HARVEY ET AL.; WEISSMAN V. COHN, LIFLAND, PERLMAN, HERMANN & KNOPF ET AL.; BROWN V. RUBIN, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY; WHITAKER V. WHITAKER ET AL.; KREIGER V. VIRGINIA; VILLACRES V. KRAMER, WARDEN, ET AL.; WHITE V. MCMILLAN ET AL.; WHITE V. MCMILLAN ET AL.; FULLER V. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; DEWIG V. STEWART, DIRECTOR, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ET AL.; MCDONALD V. TENNESSEE; BARUCH V. SMITH, WARDEN, ET AL.; WALKOVIAK V. DISTRICT COURT OF TEXAS, HARRIS COUNTY, IN RE STEIN, IN RE KENNEDY, IN RE DOYLE, DEVER V. OHIO; GAERTTNER V. LOVE ET AL.; HESTERLEE V. GOODWIN, WARDEN, IN RE WILLIAMS LEWIS, WILLIAMS V. MOORE, DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; DARDEN V. ALAMEDA COUNTY NETWORK OF MENTAL HEALTH CLIENTS ET AL.; CARTER V. CURRAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, ET AL.; RAULERSON V. GEORGIA; BERNARD V. NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORP.; BELHOMME V. WIDNALL, SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE; DAVIS V. SINGLETARY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JOHNSON V. WYOMING, IN RE RIVERA, TATAII V. CAYETANO; VIRAY V. STEUER; TURKOWSKI V. CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL.; SWINT V. UNITED STATES; MCQUOWN V. SAFEWAY, INC.; RICKETTS V. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE; SCHLEEPER V. MISSOURI; MCQUOWN V. SAFEWAY, INC.; BLACKMON V. POINDEXTER, WARDEN, ET AL.; RAWLES V. HERZOG ET AL., IN RE FLYNN, KENNEDY V. PARAMOUNT PICTURES CORP. ET AL.; NORWOOD V. UNITED STATES, IN RE BELL

U.S. | 1998-07-28
Nos. 120; No. 96-1693; No. 96-9142; No. 96-1829; No. 97-391; No. 97-1267; No. 97-1407; No. 97-1566; No. 97-1600; No. 97-1622; No. 97-1640; No. 97-1643; No. 97-1654; No. 97-6657; No. 97-7583; No. 97-7729; No. 97-7863; No. 97-7865; No. 97-7873; No. 97-7878; No. 97-7883; No. 97-7945; No. 97-8082; No. 97-8123; No. 97-8186; No. 97-8202; No. 97-8235; No. 97-8240; No. 97-8244; No. 97-8263; No. 97-8304; No. 97-8341; No. 97-8358; No. 97-8379; No. 97-8385; No. 97-8402; No. 97-8422; No. 97-8452; No. 97-8492; No. 97-8522; No. 97-8534; No. 97-8544; No. 97-8574; No. 97-8594; No. 97-8659; No. 97-8666; No. 97-8685; No. 97-8692; No. 97-8709; No. 97-8711; No. 97-8735; No. 97-8753; No. 97-8777; No. 97-8931
524 U.S. 968 Supreme Court of the United States (1998)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The court affirmed a final judgment for breach of fiduciary duty against Republic National Bank and reversed the trial court's order striking the client's claim for attorney's fees.


Holding

The court affirmed the denial of the bank's motion for summary judgment on the breach of fiduciary duty claim, finding the issue of proper monitoring was for the jury, and reversed the order striking the client's claim for attorney's fees.


Facts & Procedural History

Republic National Bank invested a client's funds in foreign certificates of deposit, which resulted in losses. The client sued for breach of fiduciary…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

523 U. S. 767; ante, p. 88; ante, p. 926; 523 U. S. 696; 523 U. S. 740; 523 U. S. 1117; ante, p. 904; 523 U. S. 1137; 523 U. S. 1122;

523 U. S. 1122; 522 U. S. 1032; 523 U. S. 1028; 523 U. S. 1061;

523 U. S. 1063; No. 97-7883. No. 97-7945. No. 97-8082. No. 97-8123. No. 97-8186. No. 97-8202. No. 97-8235. No. 97-8240. No. 97-8244. No. 97-8263. No. 97-8304. No. 97-8341. No. 97-8358. No. 97-8379. No. 97-8385. No. 97-8402. No. 97-8422. No. 97-8452. No. 97-8492. No. 97-8522. No. 97-8534. No. 97-8544. No. 97-8574. No. 97-8594. No. 97-8659. No. 97-8666. No. 97-8685. No. 97-8692. 523 U. S. 1032; 523 U. S. 1082; 523 U. S. 1098; 523 U. S. 1109; 523 U. S. 1116; 523 U. S. 1058; 523 U. S. 1058; 523 U. S. 1085; 523 U. S. 1125; 523 U.S. 1085; 523 U. S. 1116; 523 U. S. 1139; 523 U. S. 1140; 523 U. S. 1110; 523 U. S. 1127; 523 U. S. 1140; 523 U. S. 1100; 523 U. S. 1141; 523 U. S. 1111; ante, p. 903; ante, p. 907; 523 U. S. 1129; ante, p. 908; 523 U. S. 1112; 523 U. S. 1142; ante, p. 908; ante, p. 930; 523 U. S. 1142; No. 97-8709. No. 97-8711. No. 97-8735. No. 97-8753. No. 97-8777. No. 97-8931. ante, p. 919; 523 U. S. 1142; 523 U. S. 1116; ante, p. 909; 523 U. S. 1143; and 523 U. S. 1136. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (59 total)

View all 59 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw