SAM INMAN, DOROTHY L. INMAN, AND R. B. LANE INVESTMENTS COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

ROSETTE HAZAN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Hilgendorf v. Denson, 341 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
  …2d 600, 143 P. 2d 522. We agree with the proposition that if a surviving or remaining partner continues the partnership business with the partnership assets, the remaining partner is required to account to the withdrawing partner. Biers v. Sammons, 242 So. 2d 158 (3d DCA). The distinct difference between this case and the Biers case is that in the Biers case it was clearly the assets of the partnership which were the primary source of revenue (the operation of a utilities company), while in this action the p…
• Cohen v. Lansburgh, 366 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
  …terest, as reflected in the original agreement, and likewise being responsible to the joint venture or partnership in accordance with the original terms and conditions. Kartage v. Interocean, S. A., 167 So. 2d 76 (Fla.3d DCA 1964); Biers v. Sammons, 242 So. 2d 158 (Fla.3d DCA 1970); Section 620.67, Florida Statutes (1975); 24 Fla.Jur., Partnership, § 152. The appellant has also contended that the amount of attorney’s fees is unreasonable, which we find to be completely without merit. Therefore, the final ju…
• Williamson v. Houston Stephens & Houston's H & W Meats, Inc., 411 So. 2d 286 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …if a surviving or remaining partner continues the partnership business with the partnership assets, the remaining partner is required to account to the withdrawing partner. Hilgendorf v. Denson, 341 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); Biers v. Sammons, 242 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1970). By continuing the business of the partnership, a partner acts as a trustee for the withdrawing or deceased partner. Biers v. Sammons, supra, 242 So. 2d at 161. Although the third amended complaint is not a model of pleading, it…

Authorities Cited

• Henningsen v. Smith, 174 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)