ARTHUR LEWIS, DAVID L. MITCHELL, AND CLEO WILLIAMS, APPELLANTS,
v.
HOWARD E. REIN, JOHN T. HARPER, AND L. ALTON WESLEY, AS AND CONSTITUTING THE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, AND THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND WILLIAM A. DUYNSLAGER, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE WATER DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OF THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, APPELLEES
ARTHUR LEWIS, DAVID L. MITCHELL, AND CLEO WILLIAMS, APPELLANTS,
HOWARD E. REIN, JOHN T. HARPER, AND L. ALTON WESLEY, AS AND CONSTITUTING THE CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, AND THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, AND WILLIAM A. DUYNSLAGER, SUPERINTENDENT OF THE WATER DIVISION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES OF THE CITY OF PENSACOLA, FLORIDA, APPELLEES
243 So. 2d 1
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellants having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.
WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K. and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kilgore v. State, 55 So. 3d 487 (Fla. 2010)…ny relief on this claim. Third, Kilgore alleges that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to sufficiently communicate with Kilgore. The postcon-viction court, relying on Rosemond v. State, 433 So. 2d 635 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), and Byrd v. State, 243 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971), held that brevity of consultation is not grounds for postconviction relief. We agree. Even if it is established that trial counsel’s communication with his client was brief, a defendant maintains burden of establishing actual pre…
-
Atkins v. State, 303 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See: Shepherd v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So. 2d 880; Floyd v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So. 2d 105; Pearson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So. 2d 616; Jernigan v. State, Fla.1969, 228 So. 2d 273; Byrd v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 1; Quartz v. State, Fla.App.1972, 258 So. 2d 283. Compare Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 862; Robinson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So. 2d 29; Palladino v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 837.…
-
Caplinger v. State, 271 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…84 So. 2d 486; Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 164 So. 2d 224. A trial will not be viewed as a sham or mockery on the basis of the time the public defender spent with defendant, State v. Barton, Fla.1967, 194 So. 2d 241; Byrd v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 1; Williams v. State, Fla.App.1968, 215 So. 2d 617, nor will counsel be viewed as incompetent because he exercised his personal judgment and did not call a certain witness on behalf of the defense. Fuller v. Wainwright, Fla. 1970, 238 So. 2d 65; Thoma…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence