STEVE ATKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
STEVE ATKINS, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
303 So. 2d 359
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 24 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See: Shepherd v. State, Fla.1950, 46 So. 2d 880; Floyd v. State, Fla.1956, 90 So. 2d 105; Pearson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 213 So. 2d 616; Jernigan v. State, Fla.1969, 228 So. 2d 273; Byrd v. State, Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 1; Quartz v. State, Fla.App.1972, 258 So. 2d 283. Compare Simpson v. State, Fla.App.1968, 211 So. 2d 862; Robinson v. State, Fla.App.1971, 256 So. 2d 29; Palladino v. State, Fla.App.1972, 267 So. 2d 837.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Humphrey v. Seminole Cnty. Court, 309 So. 2d 234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed on the authority of State v. Hendricks, 309 So. 2d 232 (4th D.C.A.Fla.1975), and McArthur v. State, 303 So. 2d 359 (3d D.C.A.Fla.1974). Affirmed. WALDEN, CROSS and MAGER, JJ., concur.…
-
State v. Abrams, 350 So. 2d 1104 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977)…dy trial is waived when the defendant or his attorney request a continuance. The acts of an attorney on behalf of a client will be binding on the client even though done without consulting him and even against the client’s wishes. McArthur v. State, 303 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); Brown v. State, 328 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Rule 3.191 does not require that the accused be present when a waiver is made; nor does it require that waiver be made personally by the accused. In the instant case, a public d…
-
Herrick v. Se. Bank, N.A., 512 So. 2d 1029 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…ground that he, the client, acted “excusably" in hiring a competent professional to represent him — no litigation could ever be safely conducted or finally resolved. Instead, the client must be held bound by his lawyer’s actions. McArthur v. State, 303 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974). While the attorney, in turn, is liable to the client for his conduct, it may not affect the rights of the party opponent. See Bury v. McIntosh, 540 F. 2d 835, 836 (5th Cir.1976) ("[T]he merits or demerits of an attorney's represe…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Simpson v. State, 211 So. 2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Floyd v. State, 90 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 1956)
- Quartz v. State, 258 So. 2d 283 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Shepherd v. State, 46 So.2d 880 (Fla. 1950)
- Robinson v. State, 256 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Pearson v. State, 213 So. 2d 616 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Lewis v. Rein, 243 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971)
- Byrd v. State, 243 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Levigne Jernigan v. State, 228 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 1969)
- Palladino v. State, 267 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)