PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
BESSIE LINDHOLM, APPELLEE
PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
BESSIE LINDHOLM, APPELLEE
243 So. 2d 8
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
The appellant, Publix Super Markets, Inc., appeals from a final judgment rendered for the plaintiff upon an adverse jury verdict.
Appellant contends the evidence at trial was insufficient to establish actionable negligence and liability on its part.
We have reviewed the record and find this contention on behalf of appellant to be insufficient and hold that the trial court was correct in its rulings and in permitting the jury to determine the issues presented. See Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of America, Fla.1954, 73 So.2d 403; Carls Markets v. Meyer, Fla.1953, 69 So.2d 789; and Bars v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Fla.App.1969, 222 So.2d 445.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
McGARRY v. McGARRY, 247 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 2d DCA 1971)…ify the alimony provisions by extending the period for payment if the circumstances should later justify it or to otherwise alter the award as to the Chancellor at such subsequent time shall seem proper and equitable. Arthur v. Arthur, Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 8; Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.App.1967, 204 So. 2d 734. The judgment appealed is Affirmed as modified. LILES, J., concurs. McNULTY, J., concurs specially, with opinion.…1 / 2
-
Marguarite Marshall v. Marshall, 273 So. 2d 107 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…ture if such be applied for and properly allowable under § 61.14, Fla.Stat., F.S.A. Poe v. Poe, Fla.App.1972, 263 So. 2d 644; Melton v. Melton, Fla.App.1971, 251 So. 2d 705; Reed v. Reed, Fla.App.1971, 244 So. 2d 449; Arthur v. Arthur, Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 8; Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.App.1967, 204 So. 2d 734. We also note that this error was noted by the Chancellor at the hearing on appellant’s motion for a new trial. However, the late Judge John J. Kehoe was prevented from modifying his final order, as he…
-
Weinman v. Weinman, 310 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…ent is hereby modified to include such a reservation of jurisdiction. Schiff v. Schiff, Fla.App.1960, 123 So. 2d 295; Gordon v. Gordon, Fla.App.1968, 204 So. 2d 734; Barfield v. Barfield, Fla.App.1969, 226 So. 2d 132; Arthur v. Arthur, Fla.App.1971, 243 So. 2d 8; Greene v. Greene, Fla.App.1972, 256 So. 2d 258. The court did not abuse discretion in limiting the time of possession of the residence by the appellant, but we hold it was error to direct thereafter the sale of the jointly owned property. There we…
Authorities Cited
- Voelker v. Combined Ins. Co. of Am., 73 So. 2d 403 (Fla. 1954)
- Carls Mkts., Inc. v. Meyer, 69 So. 2d 789 (Fla. 1953)
- Bars v. Morrison-Knudsen Co., Inc., 222 So. 2d 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969)