DANIEL MYLES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
DANIEL MYLES, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
244 So. 2d 761
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
This cause having been orally argued before the Court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court appealed from herein is affirmed.
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., RAWLS, J., and VANN, HAROLD R., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hinton v. State, 347 So. 2d 1079 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)…or explain testimony elicited on cross-examina tion. Tampa Electric Co. v. Charles, 69 Fla. 27, 67 So. 572 (1915). It is also generally held that the scope of redirect examination rests largely in the discretion of the court. See Yanzito v. Wagner, 244 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971); 81 Am.Jur. Witnesses, § 425 (1976). The record reflects that defense counsel cross-examined the investigating officer as to whether he observed the incident, whether, he had any idea how the injuries had been inflicted aside fr…