DIANE LUCEY FROEHLING, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANK A. FROEHLING, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1971-05-04
No. 70-910
Before CHARLES CARROLL, and BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
247 So. 2d 528 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Frank v. Frank, Fla.1954, 75 So.2d 282; 2 Fla.Jur. “Appeals”, § 290, p. 629; Mickler v. Mickler, Fla.App.1958, 101 So.2d 157.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Salas v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 272 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1972)
    …ADKINS, Justice. By petition for certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal Third District (Salas v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Fla.App., 247 So. 2d 528), which allegedly conflicts with a decision of this Court (Hodges v. National Union Indemnity Company, Fla., 249 So. 2d 679), and other decisions on the same point of law. Fla.Const., art. V, § 4, F.S.A. This was an action brought by Liberty Mutual…
  • Salas v. Liberty Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 273 So. 2d 96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
    …PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on April 27, 1971 (247 So. 2d 528) affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed December 13, 1972 (272…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw