WAYNE MATTOX, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Fla. Tomato Packers, Inc. v. Wilson, 296 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
  …er joint or several, including vicarious tort feasors. Hertz Corporation v. Hellens, Fla.App.1962, 140 So. 2d 73; Mathis v. Virgin, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 897, cert. den., Fla.1965, 174 So. 2d 30; Talcott v. Central Bank & Trust Co., Fla.App.1971, 247 So. 2d 727, cert. dis, Fla. 1972, 262 So. 2d 658. Motions for directed verdict, judgments in accordance with motion for directed verdict upon which ruling has been withheld, and judgments n. o. V., all share the following rules relating to their disposition b…
• SUN First Nat'l Bank OF Melbourne v. Lael N. Batchelor, 321 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1975)
  …ON and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur. ADKINS, C. J., concurs with conclusion. . National Bank of Melbourne & Trust Co. v. Batchelor, 266 So. 2d 185 (4th DCA Fla. App.), cert. denied, 269 So. 2d 369 (Fla.1972). . See Talcott v. Central Bank and Trust Co., 247 So. 2d 727 (3d DCA Fla.App.1971), decision approved, 262 So. 2d 658 (Fla.1972) ; Daniels, Torts, 14 U.Mia.L.Rev. 602, 629 (1960). Cf. Smith v. Ryder Truck Rentals, Inc., 182 So. 2d 422 (Fla.1966). . A more elaborate discussion of the policy reasons for applyi…
• Buster Walker v. U-Haul Co., Inc., 300 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)
  …sfying the judgment obtained against Humphrey and U-Haul Company of North Carolina, Inc. was intended to release only those defendants and not all joint tort feasors, and under the authority of Talcott v. Central Bank & Trust Company, Fla.App. 1971, 247 So. 2d 727 (cert, disch. Fla. 1972, 262 So. 2d 658), such satisfaction of judgment should be considered only as a pro tanto release under Section 768.041, F.S. Appellant also relies upon the case of Mathis v. Virgin, Fla.App.1964, 167 So. 2d 897 (cert. den. Fl…