RINGER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Hughes v. State, 901 So. 2d 837 (Fla. 2005)
  …ural rules, a conclusion we have reached in numerous other contexts.”); United States v. Sanders, 247 F. 3d 139, 148 (4th Cir.) (stating that the Apprendi rule “merely shifts the fact-finding duties from an impartial judge to a jury”), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032, 122 S.Ct. 573, 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001). Moreover, Apprendi permits a judge to continue to make these same factual determinations as long as the resulting sentence does not exceed the statutory maximum. See Harris v. United States, 536 U.S. 545, 557…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Windom v. State, 886 So. 2d 915 (Fla. 2004)
  …S. 1097, 122 S.Ct. 848, 151 L.Ed.2d 725 (2002); McCoy v. United States, 266 F. 3d 1245, 1258 (11th Cir. 2001), cert. denied, 536 U.S. 906, 122 S.Ct. 2362, 153 L.Ed.2d 183 (2002); United States v. Sanders, 247 F. 3d 139, 146 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032, 122 S.Ct. 573, 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); Gisi v. State, 848 So. 2d 1278, 1282 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); Hughes v. State, 826 So. 2d 1070, 1074-75 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002), review granted, 837 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 2003). . The court opined, for example, that Arizon…
• Galindez v. State, 910 So. 2d 284 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)
  …terwards. Accord United States v. Price, 400 F. 3d 844 (10th Cir.2005), petition for cert. filed, — U.S.L.W. -, — U.S. -, — S.Ct. -, — L.Ed.2d - (U.S. May 31, 2005)(No. 04-10694); United States v. Sanders, 247 F. 3d 139 (4th Cir.2001), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 1032, 122 S.Ct. 573, 151 L.Ed.2d 445 (2001); see also Hughes, 901 So. 2d at 838 (Apprendi does not apply retroactively to convictions which were final when Apprendi was decided). Contra Isaac v. State, 911 So. 2d 813, 2005 WL 1467321 (Fla. 1st DCA Case n…