STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. LORIN LEE FURLONG, RELATOR,
v.
THE HONORABLE MURRAY GOODMAN, AS JUDGE OF THE CRIMINAL COURT OF RECORD IN AND FOR DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENT

Fla. 3d DCA | 1971-06-14
No. 70-515
Before PEARSON, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and BARKDULL, JJ.
248 So. 2d 690 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1971) Negative Treatment
Cited by 9 cases
Topics
Rule Nisi Mandate Writ Of Prohibition

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rule Nisi cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment in prohibition of this court was entered on July 28, 1970 (238 So.2d ISO) making absolute the rule nisi heretofore rendered against the respondent as judge of the Criminal Court of Record for Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed April 21, 1971 (247 So.2d 47), and mandate dated May 7, 1971, now lodged in this court, quashed this court’s judgment with instructions to discharge the rule nisi and to dismiss the prohibition proceeding;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the judgment of this court heretofore issued in this cause on July 28, 1970 is withdrawn and vacated, the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court, the rule nisi heretofore issued in this cause is discharged and the Suggestion for a Writ of Prohibition is dismissed. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the Criminal Court of Record (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Arnold v. State, 265 So. 2d 64 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
    …Another of appellant’s multiple challenges to the judgment and sentence below concerns the propriety of his being sent to the Dade County Jail rather than the juvenile hall. We have considered this point in the light of In re A. J. A., Fla.App.1971, 248 So. 2d 690. We express the opinion that under the circumstances of this case where a minor was charged with a capital offense and surrendered to the Metropolitan Public Safety Department across the street from the jail at sometime after 6:00 o’clock P.M. and s…
  • Rogert L. Dowst v. State, 336 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)
    …n given by him before either (1) he is granted the right to make such call, or (2) the officer makes a good faith effort to so advise his parents, is inadmissible in evidence. See Arnold v. State, 265 So. 2d 64 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1972); In re: A. J. A., 248 So. 2d 690 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1971) and Roberts v. State, 285 So. 2d 385 (Fla.1973). The second point urged relates to alleged variances in allegation and proof of ownership of the money in question. When the evidence was presented, no objection was made as to al…
  • Roberts v. State, 285 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 1973)
    …reached in In Re A. J.A., supra, on facts which are similar to those presently under review. In view of the explicit mandatory language of F.S. Section 39.03(3), F.S.A., we feel we must adopt the rationale of the In Re AJ.A, holding as expressed at 248 So. 2d 690, at 692. Cf. Oliver v. State, 250 So. 2d 888 (Fla. 1971); see generally In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 18 L.Ed.2d 527 (1967). Accordingly, the decision of the District Court is quashed and the cause remanded to the First District Court of…

Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw