DENNIS L. THOMPSON, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Ozzie Joseph Negron and Teresa Negron v. State, 306 So. 2d 104 (Fla. 1974)
  …as manufactured, the price being paid for similar merchandise in the vicinity — in addition to the other factors mentioned herein. This question has been considered, however, by the Third District Court of Appeal in Thompson v. State (Fla.App.1971), 249 So. 2d 51, where the defendant-appellant was convicted of grand larceny of 28 pairs of pants and 8 shirts from a retail store. An employee of the store testified to a retail value of more than $400 and a wholesale value of 'more than $100. This conviction was…
• Cardinal Scott v. State, 519 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …roper to instruct jury in grand theft case that value of goods sold at retail is “the sale price of the merchandise at the time it was stolen”), aff’g, 443 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Negron v. State, 306 So. 2d 104 (Fla.1974); Thompson v. State, 249 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Although there is no case which so holds, and although the defendants do not suggest what the nature of that evidence might be, they contend that the state must also introduce some independent testimony that the merchandise was “…
• Jones v. State, 434 So. 2d 337 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …e [*338] V, Section 3(b)(4) of the Florida Constitution, that' our decision herein is in direct conflict with the majority opinion in the above-stated Williams case. We find no merit in the defendant’s remaining point on appeal. Thompson v. State, 249 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); § 812.015(1)(c), Fla.Stat. (1981). Reversed and remanded for a new trial.…