WILLIE JAMES WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Frivolous Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent-defendant and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Crum v. State, Fla.App.1965, 172 So.2d 24; Stewart v. State, Fla.App.1969, 221 So.2d 155; Thomas v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 118; Tafero v. State, Fla.App.1969, 223 So.2d 564. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted and the order or judgment is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (37 total)
-
Estes v. State, 294 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)…pted Rule 3.170(j), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 33 F.S.A., is untenable since the factual basis clause in that rule is inapplicable in cases where the guilty plea is the result of plea bargaining. See this court’s opinion in Kelly v. State, 254 So. 2d 22 (1971), wherein we stated at page 24 the following: “There is yet another reason reflected in the record because of which the trial court properly accepted the guilty plea. The decision in Boykin recognized the strategic aspect of a guilty plea, st…
-
Davis v. State, 277 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973)…n Hill v. State, 256 So. 2d 239 (2d D.C.A.Fla.1972), this court uttered finally a truism, “As to his right to ‘not to testify against himself,’ suffice to say that he did not ‘testify against himself’ because there was no trial.” In Kelly v. State, 254 So. 2d 22 (1st D.C.A.Fla.1971), the First District said: “In our view, the record of the proceedings when taken in its totality justifies the acceptance of the guilty plea. That the court itself did not advise as to appellant’s right to remain silent or righ…
-
Mower v. State, 308 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)…the factual basis for a plea of guilty and to fail to advise a defendant of his privilege -against compulsory self-incrimination and right to be confronted by his accusers prior to accepting a bargained plea. (See Kelly v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1971, 254 So. 2d 22; Sumner v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 289 So. 2d 434; Estes v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 294 So. 2d 122; Lyles v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1974, 299 So. 2d 146; and Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274) The facts sub judice are…1 / 2
Previewing 3 of 37 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Crum v. State, 172 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965)
- Tafero v. State, 223 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Grover Cleveland Stewart v. State, 221 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969)
- Thomas v. State, 223 So. 2d 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)