HUBERT FOUNTAIN, A/K/A HUBERT FOUNTAIN, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1971-11-30
No. P-115
Spector, C.J., Carroll, Donald K., J., Wigginton, J.
254 So. 2d 859 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1971)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The court dismissed the untimely appeal but granted the habeas corpus petition to allow full appellate review of the order denying the motion to vacate judgment and sentence.


Holding

A habeas corpus petition may be used to obtain full appellate review when a notice of appeal is not timely filed.


Headnotes

[1] A habeas corpus petition may serve as an alternative remedy to obtain full appellate review when a direct appeal is dismissed for failure to timely file a notice of appea…

Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Appellant's public defender failed to timely file a notice of appeal from an order denying appellant's motion to vacate judgment and sentence.…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The State’s motion to dismiss this appeal seeking review of an adverse order denying appellant’s motion to vacate judgment and sentence is granted inasmuch as the notice of appeal was not timely filed by the public defender, who was appointed by the court below to represent appellant in this cause.

However, appellant’s petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking full appellate review of the order denying his motion to vacate in the manner set forth by the Florida Supreme Court’s decisions in Hollingshead v. Wainwright, 194 So.2d 577 (Fla.1967), is granted on authority of Burke v. State, 160 So.2d 523 (Fla.App.1964), and Cappetta v. Wainwright, 203 So.2d 609 (Fla.1967).

The record of the proceedings below having already been filed in connection with the attempted appeal, the same will serve as the record in this court for the purpose of affording appellant a full appellate review of the order entered in the trial court. Appellant having already filed his brief, all that remains to be done in order for the court to consider this matter on its merits is the filing of the appellee’s brief, which shall be filed within twenty days from date of this order.

SPECTOR, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw