ARBAUGH

v.

Y & H CORP., DBA THE MOONLIGHT CAFE

Citator

Cited By

• Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp., 546 U.S. 500 (U.S. 2006)
  …, and their shareholder wives were not “employees” for Title VII purposes, 380 F. 3d, at 225-230, and it was undisputed that Y&H “did not employ the requisite 15 employees without the inclusion of” those persons, id., at 231. We granted certiorari, 544 U. S. 1031 (2005), to resolve conflicting opinions in Courts of Appeals on the question whether Title VII’s employee-numerosity requirement, 42 U. S. C. §2000e(b), is jurisdictional or simply an element of a plaintiff’s claim for relief. Compare, e. g., 380 F…
• United States v. Georgia, 546 U.S. 151 (U.S. 2006)
  …that Goodman’s Title II claims for money damages against the State were barred by sovereign immunity. We granted certiorari to consider whether Title II of the ADA validly abrogates state sovereign immunity with respect to the claims at issue here. 544 U. S. 1031 (2005). [*157] II In reversing the dismissal of Goodman’s § 1983 claims, the Eleventh Circuit held that Goodman had alleged actual violations of the Eighth Amendment by state agents on the grounds set forth above. See App. A to Pet. for Cert, in No…
• Nat'l Wrestling Coaches Assn. v. Dep't of Educ., 545 U.S. 1154 (U.S. 2005)
  …[*1154] ante, p. 1104; 544 U. S. 1031; 544 U. S. 949; 544 U. S. 1018; 544 U. S. 1032; 544 U. S. 1018; 544 U. S. 1032; 544 U. S. 1032; ante, p. 1112; 544 U. S. 1033; 544 U. S. 1034; 544 U. S. 1034; ante, p. 1105; 544 U. S. 1062; 543 U. S. 1065; 544 U. S. 1034; 543 U. S. 1163; 544 U. S. 1…

  ← 1 / 2 →