NATIONAL WRESTLING COACHES ASSN. ET AL.
v.
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; SINGH V. GONZALES, ATTORNEY GENERAL; DEYERBERG V. WOODWARD ET AL.; PITTS V. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; DUGAS V. CLARON CORP.; HARLEY V. ADLER ET AL.; UNITED STATES EX REL. GAY ET AL. V. LINCOLN TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC.; CLANCY V. AT&T CORP.; AND CLANCY V. COMCAST CORP. ET AL.; HEMBREE V. UNITED STATES; FLOYD V. MARYLAND; MOLLINGER-WILSON ET VIR V. QUIZNO'S FRANCHISE CO.; PEARSON V. UNITED STATES; GIBLER V. BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (TWO JUDGMENTS); PEARL V. CASON, WARDEN; PAUL V. FOX ET AL.; DAVIS ET AL. V. UNITED STATES CONGRESS; CARUSO V. TRUSTEE OF ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL ET AL.; CLAY V. ROPER, SUPERINTENDENT, POTOSI CORRECTIONAL CENTER; OBI V. TEXAS (TWO JUDGMENTS); RAMIREZ-ROBLES V. UNITED STATES; FREMONDE V. CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK, ET AL.; GENTRY V. BUTLER, WARDEN; HENDRICKS V. RUSHTON, WARDEN, ET AL.; JACKSON V. CITY OF SIKESTON POLICE DEPARTMENT; KWIATKOWSKI V. J. P. MORGAN CHASE & CO.; SANCHO V. RAMIREZ ET AL.; DUARTE V. SNEDEKER, WARDEN; WANSING V. SMELSER, WARDEN, ET AL.; WASHINGTON V. AMERICAN DRUG STORES, INC.; LAMAR-HOGAN V. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR; WALLS V. SECURITY ENFORCEMENT BUREAU OF NEW YORK, INC., ET AL.; EYAJAN V. SMITH ET AL.; SMITH V. VIRGINIA; RAY V. NEW JERSEY; WATERS V. SCHWARTZ, WARDEN; VORA V. STRASSBURGER, MCKENNA, MESSER, SHILOBOD & GUTNICK; THOMAS V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; BASCOM V. FRIED ET AL.; MENDOZA V. LANE ET AL.; HICKS V. COLLINS, WARDEN; WOODS V. RENICO, WARDEN; ROWE V. ROBERT HALF INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL.; DUNLAP V. HATHAWAY, JUDGE, CIRCUIT COURT OF MICHIGAN, THIRD CIRCUIT; MASKO V. UNITED STATES; KING V. THOMAS, WARDEN; JONES V. SALEEBY ET AL.; STERLING V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; PLCH V. COPLAN, WARDEN; ALLEN V. CROSBY, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; WINGATE V. UNITED STATES; WARFIELD V. SOUTH DAKOTA; JALOMO LOPEZ V. DRETKE, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION; BALLENTINE V. ILLINOIS STATE POLICE; ALLEN V. MAXWELL-HODGES ET AL.; BUNCH V. STALDER, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS; ATHANASIADES V. EDELMAN; HOHMANN V. WOOD, DBA WOOD OBERHOLTZER; PORTER V. MICHIGAN PAROLE BOARD ET AL.; HUMMINGWAY, AKA GOLDENSTEIN V. UNITED STATES; STRATTON V. UNITED STATES; EVANS ET AL. V. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT ET AL.; BLOM V. UNITED STATES, IN RE PEDRAZA, IN RE WILLIAMS, BUCULEI V. UNITED STATES; MOODY V. DELRAY BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL.

U.S. | 2005-08-01
Nos. 04-922; No. 04-1038; No. 04-1076; No. 04-1151; No. 04-1180; No. 04-1194; No. 04-1202; No. 04-1205; No. 04-1210; No. 04-1211; No. 04-1306; No. 04-1337; No. 04-1357; No. 04-6120; No. 04-7058; No. 04-7514; No. 04-7694; No. 04-8018; No. 04-8230; No. 04-8310; No. 04-8415; No. 04-8608; No. 04-8734; No. 04-8801; No. 04-8804; No. 04-8843; No. 04-8848; No. 04-8859; No. 04-8886; No. 04-8897; No. 04-8936; No. 04-8948; No. 04-8951; No. 04-8953; No. 04-8977; No. 04-8989; No. 04-9017; No. 04-9023; No. 04-9030; No. 04-9053; No. 04-9180; No. 04-9207; No. 04-9221; No. 04-9289; No. 04-9290; No. 04-9323; No. 04-9337; No. 04-9347; No. 04-9360; No. 04-9376; No. 04-9378; No. 04-9400; No. 04-9452; No. 04-9457; No. 04-9471; No. 04-9499; No. 04-9511; No. 04-9523; No. 04-9565; No. 04-9636; No. 04-9662; No. 04-9670; No. 04-9715; No. 04-9849; No. 04-9861; No. 04-9874
545 U.S. 1154 Supreme Court of the United States (2005)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

This Supreme Court opinion represents a summary order denying petitions for rehearing in approximately fifty-four separate cases that had been decided during the Court's 2004 term, spanning diverse legal issues including immigration, criminal justice, civil rights, employment, and administrative law. The Court's action affirmed its earlier decisions in these matters by denying requests to reconsider those judgments.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

ante, p. 1104; 544 U. S. 1031; 544 U. S. 949; 544 U. S. 1018; 544 U. S. 1032; 544 U. S. 1018; 544 U. S. 1032; 544 U. S. 1032; ante, p. 1112; 544 U. S. 1033; 544 U. S. 1034; 544 U. S. 1034; ante, p. 1105; 544 U. S. 1062; 543 U. S. 1065; 544 U. S. 1034; 543 U. S. 1163; 544 U. S. 951; 544 U. S. 963; 544 U. S. 982; 544 U. S. 1001; 544 U. S. 1003; No. 04-8804. No. 04-8843. No. 04-8848. No. 04-8859. No. 04-8886. No. 04-8897. No. 04-8936. No. 04-8948. No. 04-8951. No. 04-8953. No. 04-8977. No. 04-8989. No. 04-9017. No. 04-9023. No. 04-9030. No. 04-9053. No. 04-9180. No. 04-9207. No. 04-9221. No. 04-9289. No. 04-9290. No. 04-9323. No. 04-9337. No. 04-9347. No. 04-9360. No. 04-9376. No. 04-9378. 544 U. S. 1003; 544 U. S. 1019; 544 U. S. 1019; 544 U. S. 1020; 544 U. S. 1020; 544 U. S. 1021; 544 U. S. 1021; 544 U. S. 1004;

544 U. S. 1037; 544 U. S. 1039; 544 U. S. 1051; 544 U. S. 1051; 544 U. S. 1006; 544 U. S. 1052;

544 U. S. 1040; 544 U. S. 1008; 544 U. S. 1040; No. 04-9400. No. 04-9452. No. 04-9457. No. 04-9471. No. 04-9499. No. 04-9511. No. 04-9523. No. 04-9565. No. 04-9636. No. 04-9662. No. 04-9670. No. 04-9715. No. 04-9849. No. 04-9861. No. 04-9874. 544 U. S. 1064; 544 U. S. 1040; 544 U. S. 1065; 544 U. S. 1065; 544 U. S. 1025; ante, p. 1107; ante, p. 1107; 544 U. S. 1041; 544 U. S. 1042; 544 U. S. 1066; 544 U. S. 1043; 544 U. S. 1031; 544 U. S. 1048; 544 U. S. 1067; and ante, p. 1120. Petitions for rehearing denied.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited (75 total)

View all 75 cited authorities →

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw