FLORIDA STATE CONSTRUCTORS SERVICE, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
MIGUELA HERNANDEZ, A/K/A MIGUEL A. HERNANDEZ, ET AL., APPELLEES
FLORIDA STATE CONSTRUCTORS SERVICE, INC., APPELLANT,
MIGUELA HERNANDEZ, A/K/A MIGUEL A. HERNANDEZ, ET AL., APPELLEES
262 So. 2d 450
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
The judgment of dismissal is affirmed, but the judgment is hereby modified to be without prejudice to the plaintiff to proceed at law.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Wells, 308 So. 2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)…So. 598 (Fla.1932) ; Sawyer v. State, 94 Fla. 60, 113 So. 736 (Fla.1927) ; Williams v. Phiel, 60 Fla. 272, 53 So. 638 (Fla.1910); LaFrance Cleaners & Dyers, Inc., v. Argenio, 147 So. 2d 330 (3rd D.C.A. 1962); Marks v. Insurance Service Bureau, Inc., 262 So. 2d 450 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.App. 1972). This presumption has ripened into finality. Criminal Procedure Rule 3.220 (j)(l) provides: “If, at any time during the course of the proceedings, it is brought to the attention of the court that a party has failed to com…
-
Wilson v. Sirkin Bldg. Corp., 336 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…dgment here under review be and the same is hereby affirmed. Miami Roofing & Sheet Metal Co., Inc. v. Kindt, Fla.1950, 48 So. 2d 840; Gidney Auto Sales v. Cutchins, Fla.App. 1957, 97 So. 2d 145; Marks v. Insurance Service Bureau, Inc., Fla.App.1972, 262 So. 2d 450; Mitchell v. Morse Operations, Inc., Fla.App.1973, 276 So. 2d 248; Walker v. Connolly, Fla.App.1974, 299 So. 2d 67. Affirmed.…
-
Mitchell v. Morse Operations, Inc., 276 So. 2d 248 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)…ailed to sustain her burden of proving the defendants negligent. The judgment rendered in a non-jury trial is presumed correct and the trial judge’s findings have the quality of a jury verdict. Marks v. Insurance Service Bureau, Inc., Fla.App.1972, 262 So. 2d 450; Bardee Corp. v. Arnold Altex Aluminum Co., Fla.App.1961, 134 So. 2d 268. Upon appeal it comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness and the burden rests upon the appellant to make error clearly appear. Marks, supra; Hall v. Hall,…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence