JULIA C. MITCHELL, APPELLANT,
v.
MORSE OPERATIONS, INC., ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Mrs. Mitchell purchased a car financed through a bank that required credit life insurance. The policy was issued on her life alone, rather than her husband's, and when he died six months later, she was unable to collect. She sued the car dealer, financing bank, and insurance company for negligence, but the trial court found no negligence and entered judgment for defendants. Mitchell appealed.
The trial court did not err in holding that the plaintiff failed to sustain her burden of proving the defendants negligent. No reversible error was found to warrant reversal of the judgment entered in favor of the defendants.
[1] A judgment rendered in a non-jury trial is presumed correct and the trial judge's findings have the quality of a jury verdict.
[2] On appeal, a judgment comes to the appellate court clothed with a presumption of correctness, and the burden rests upon the appellant to make error clearly appear.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The judgment rendered in a non-jury trial is presumed correct and the trial judge's findings have the quality of a jury verdict.”
Establishes the standard of review and presumption of correctness for bench trial judgments on appeal
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMrs. Mitchell purchased a new automobile from Friendly Ford financed through First National Bank of Miami. Both she and her husband signed the securit…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Presumption Of Correctness Of Trial Court Judgment cases and more on FLexlaw
This is an appeal from a final judgment in a non-jury trial entered in favor of defendants in an action for negligence.
Plaintiff, Mrs. Mitchell, purchased from defendant Friendly Ford a new automobile which was financed through the First National Bank of Miami. The title was placed in plaintiff’s name, but both she and her husband, as required, signed the security agreement for financing. The bank required credit life insurance. Accordingly, an insurance policy was issued in the name of, and on the life of, plaintiff Mrs. Mitchell, who the record reveals upon purchase of the automobile failed to designate who the insured would be on the credit life insurance policy. Her husband died approximately six months later. Thereafter plaintiff attempted to collect on the policy, but was informed it was issued on her name only. She then filed action for damages against Morse Operations, Inc. and Cecil Holland Ford, Inc. d/b/a Friendly Ford Co., First National Bank of Miami, and Fidelity Life Association of Fulton, Illinois. Summary judgment was awarded to defendant First National Bank of Miami before trial and it is not a party to this appeal. Judgment was entered for defendants and plaintiff appealed.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in holding that plaintiff failed to sustain her burden of proving the defendants negligent.
The judgment rendered in a non-jury trial is presumed correct and the trial judge’s findings have the quality of a jury verdict. Marks v. Insurance Service Bureau, Inc., Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 450; Bardee Corp. v. Arnold Altex Aluminum Co., Fla.App.1961, 134 So.2d 268. Upon appeal it comes to this court clothed with a presumption of correctness and the burden rests upon the appellant to make error clearly appear. Marks, supra; Hall v. Hall, Fla.App.1961, 135 So.2d 432; Gars v. Woodard, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 385.
No reversible error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Martin v. Green, 134 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1961)
- Hall v. Hall, 135 So. 2d 432 (Fla. 3d DCA 1961)
- Irwin S. Gars v. Woodard, 214 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)
- Fla. State Constructors Serv., Inc. v. Miguela Hernandez, 262 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Marks v. Ins. Serv. Bureau, Inc., 262 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)