HARVEY BRUCE ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1972-03-21
Nos. P-166, P-420
265 So. 2d 431 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1972) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Keaton v. State, 268 So. 2d 905 (Fla. 1972)
    …Certiorari denied. 265 So. 2d 431. ERVIN, Acting C. J., and CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD and McCAIN, JJ., concur.…
  • Roberts v. State, 378 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)
    …was denied effective assistance of counsel on appeal because his court-appointed counsel did not raise on direct appeal certain trial errors which allegedly should have been raised. Roberts’ conviction was affirmed by this court in Roberts v. State, 265 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972), cert. den. 265 So. 2d 50 (Fla.1972). From our examination of the record in Roberts’ direct appeal, it appears that the public defender handling his appeal scrupulously followed the procedures prescribed in Anders v. California,…
  • Roberts v. State, 292 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
    …PER CURIAM. The same factual situation which is involved in the case sub judice has been repeatedly considered by this court. See Roberts v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1st 1971, 251 So. 2d 157; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 265 So. 2d 431; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 266 So. 2d 421; and Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1973, 281 So. 2d 219. We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by both the appellant and the appellee and find that the appella…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw