HARVEY BRUCE ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
HARVEY BRUCE ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
292 So. 2d 371
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1974)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The same factual situation which is involved in the case sub judice has been repeatedly considered by this court. See Roberts v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1st 1971, 251 So. 2d 157; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 265 So. 2d 431; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 266 So. 2d 421; and Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1973, 281 So. 2d 219.
We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by both the appellant and the appellee and find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Therefore, the order appealed from be and it is hereby affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER and Mc-CORD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Roberts v. State, 521 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). He filed a second Rule 3.850 motion, raising the issues of illegal consecutive sentences and ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied that motion, and this court per curiam affirmed. Roberts v. State, 292 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Appellant filed a third Rule 3.850 motion, raising a double jeopardy issue. The trial court denied the motion. Appellant filed a fourth Rule 3.850 motion, raising again the issue of illegal consecutive sentences and error in the…
Authorities Cited
- Mursten v. Mursten, 266 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)
- Roberts v. State, 281 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973)
- Roberts v. State, 265 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972)
- Keaton v. State, 265 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
- MacDONALD v. Price, 251 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971)
- Sligh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 251 So. 2d 157 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971)