R. E. F., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. | 1972-07-26
No. 41542
ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, DEKLE and McCAIN, JJ., concur.
265 So. 2d 701 Florida Supreme Court (1972) Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on appeal from the District Court of Appeal, First District. *702The decision sought to be reviewed1 initially construes provisions of the Federal and Florida Constitutions relating to the concept of fundamental fairness in juvenile court proceedings, giving this Court jurisdiction under § 4 of Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A.

After argument and upon careful consideration of the record and briefs, we conclude that the excellent opinion of the District Court correctly answers the questions involved. No additional explanation or decision by way of an opinion of this Court is needed.

Accordingly, the decision of the District Court of Appeal is affirmed.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, C. J., and ERVIN, CARLTON, ADKINS, BOYD, DEKLE and McCAIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Jones, 425 So. 2d 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
    …ation sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction before a court of competent jurisdiction, and a jury has been sworn and charged or the court begins to hear the evidence. See, State v. R.E.F., 251 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971), affm’d 265 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1972). Since appellee’s probation revocation hearing concerned only her sentence for a prior offense, she may not be said to have been put in jeopardy for the instant offense. Further, the trial judge’s refusal to revoke probation cannot be equ…
  • State v. Justice, 451 So. 2d 1056 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)
    …ation sufficient in form and substance to sustain a conviction before a court of competent jurisdiction, and a jury has been sworn and charged or the court begins to hear the evidence. See, State v. R.E.F., 251 So. 2d 672 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971), affm'd 265 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1972). Since appellee’s probation revocation hearing concerned only her sentence for a prior offense, she may not be said to have been put in jeopardy for the instant offense. Further, the trial judge’s refusal to revoke probation cannot be equ…
  • …d December 7, 1973. In view whereof, the rule heretofore issued herein should be, and it is hereby, made absolute. Prohibition granted. MANN, C. J., and McNULTY and BOARDMAN, JJ., concur. . (Fla.App. 1st, 1971), 251 So. 2d 672, aff’d (Fla.1972), 265 So. 2d 701.…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw