CHARLES F. LINDSAY, APPELLANT,

v.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, A FOREIGN CORPORATION, DOING BUSINESS IN FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1972-09-19

No. 71-1412

Before BARKDULL, C. J., and PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ.

266 So. 2d 363 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1972) Positive Treatment

Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon the authority of Cia. Ecuatoriana de Aviacion, C.A. v. U. S. and Overseas Corp., Fla.App.1962, 144 So.2d 338.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Janies Ferguson v. Little, 273 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 1973)

…Certiorari denied. 266 So. 2d 363. CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…
Corio v. Lopez, 190 So. 3d 1152 (Fla. 5th DCA 2016)

…ction lies in the circuit court for the county in which either the plaintiff or defendant resides. § 742.021(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). This specific venue statute controls over the general venue statute in paternity proceedings. See Ferguson v. Little, 266 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); Paulet v. Hickey, 206 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 2d- DCA 1968). Corio’s initial selection of venue was proper under section 742.021 since he resides in Orange County. When venue is proper in more than one county, a .plaintiff may choose to…
Beckford v. Drogan, 198 So. 3d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016)

…ction lies in the circuit court for the county in which either the plaintiff or defendant resides. § 742.021(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). This specific venue statute controls over the general venue statute in paternity proceedings. See Ferguson v. Little, 266 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972); Paulet v. Hickey, 206 So. 2d 29 (Fla. 2d DCA 1968). Corio’s initial selection of venue was proper under section 742.021 since he resides in Orange County. When venue is proper in more than one county, a plaintiff may choose to"…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw