HARRY MURSTEN, APPELLANT,

v.

LINDA FENTON MURSTEN, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Roberts v. State, 292 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
  …situation which is involved in the case sub judice has been repeatedly considered by this court. See Roberts v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1st 1971, 251 So. 2d 157; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 265 So. 2d 431; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 266 So. 2d 421; and Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1973, 281 So. 2d 219. We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by both the appellant and the appellee and find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. There…
• Roberts v. State, 521 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
  …as convicted of three counts of kidnapping, and sentenced to consecutive terms of ten, five and five years incarceration on the three counts. He sought review of the conviction and sentence in this court, which per curiam affirmed. Roberts v. State, 266 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). He then filed a Rule 3.850 motion, raising a speedy trial issue. The trial court denied the motion, and this court per curiam affirmed. Roberts v. State, 281 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). He filed a second Rule 3.850 motion, r…