PANNING LUMBER AND SUPPLY COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.

CLIFFORD H. SEXTON, RESPONDENT

Citator

Cited By

• Palm Beach Cnty. v. Savage Constr. Corp., 627 So. 2d 1332 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993)
  …te had knowledge of the claim which was attached to the complaint, and the estate was not prejudiced by the amendment, the error was merely a correctable misno mer). See also Sexton v. Panning Lumber Co., 260 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 271 So. 2d 764 (Fla.1972); Thomas v. Taylor Creek Marina of Fort Pierce, Inc., 520 So. 2d 708 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Francese v. Tamarac Hosp. Corp., 504 So. 2d 546 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Cf., Michelin Reifenwerke, A.G. v. Roose, 462 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984), rev…
• Palomares v. Ocean Bank OF Miami, 574 So. 2d 1159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
  …have been nonfinal and nonap-pealable. Fla.R.App.P. 9.130(a)(3). See Hawaiian Inn of Daytona Beach, Inc. v. Snead Constr. Corp., 393 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981); Sexton v. Panning Lumber Co., 260 So. 2d 898, 902-903 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 271 So. 2d 764 (Fla.1972). The judgment of foreclosure entered on the severed counterclaim is affirmed. . Section 673.407, Florida Statutes (1985) states in pertinent part: (1) Any alteration of an instrument is material which changes the contract of any party…
• HERTZ Int'l, Ltd. v. Richardson, 317 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
  ….App. 1962, 140 So. 2d 601; McNayr v. Cranbrook Investments, Inc., Fla.1963, 158 So. 2d 129; Cabot v. Clearwater Construction Company, Fla.1956, 89 So. 2d 662; and Sexton v. Panning Lumber Company, Fla.App.1972, 260 So. 2d 898, cert, den., Fla.1972, 271 So. 2d 764. It is true that where one corporation uses several names a correction can be made to show the actual entity sued. The present situation transcends that proposition. It was clear from the filing of the first amended complaint that there were two se…

Authorities Cited

• Sexton v. Panning Lumber Co., 260 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)