FRED S. LEWIN, APPELLANT,
v.
U. S. INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1973-01-24
No. 72-546
Before BARKDULL, C. J., and CHARLES CARROLL and HENDRY, JJ-
272 So. 2d 183 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Elsberry v. Sexton, 61 Fla. 162, 54 So. 592; Yates v. Ball, 132 Fla. 132, 181 So. 341; Mann v. Thompson, Fla.App. 1958, 100 So.2d 634; Williams v. Faile, Fla.App.1960, 118 So.2d 599; Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Inc., Fla.App.1965, 173 So.2d 492; Tanenbaum v. Biscayne Osteopathic Hospital, Fla.1966, 190 So.2d 777; Buyer Finance Corporation v. Oliveros, Fla.App.1967, 196 So.2d 451; Summerfield v. Sullivan, N.Y.S.Ct.1908, 113 N.Y.S. 552; McGovern v. Madame Elize, Inc., 137 Misc. 599, 244 N.Y.S. 169; Vol. 3, Williston on Contracts, 3rd Ed., § 533A, page 808.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Nettie Davis v. Ferraro, 303 So. 2d 407 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
    …d Industries, Inc., Fla.App. 1967, 193 So. 2d 480; Niagara of Florida, Inc. v. Niagara Therapy Manufacturing Corporation, Fla.App.1970, 231 So. 2d 277; Keller v. Penovich, Fla.App.1972, 262 So. 2d 243; Lewin v. U. S. Industries, Inc., Fla.App. 1973, 272 So. 2d 183. Therefore, the final judgment under review be and the same is hereby reversed, with directions to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint and cause of action. Reversed and remanded, with directions.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw