STATE OF FLORIDA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT KANTER, DEFENDANT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
This interlocutory appeal concerns a partial summary final judgment in favor of the insurer, Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company, on all claims against it except those related to property damage caused by a lift's collapse in London.
The trial court granted a partial summary judgment for the insurer, finding that the insurance policy did not cover claims against the insurer except for property damage resulting from the specific incident in London.
Plaintiff purchased "Hi-Lift Scissor Lifts" from the Traficants, alleging breach of express and implied warranties and negligent design. One lift coll…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certified Question cases and more on FLexlaw
Upon a review of the certificate forwarded to us pursuant to Rule 4.6, F.A.R., 32 F.S.A., and an examination of the applicable authorities, we must respectfully decline to answer the question. Boyer v. City of Orlando, Fla.1970, 232 So.2d 169; First National Bank & T. Co. v. Great American Ins. Co., Fla.App.1972, 257 So.2d 73; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So.2d 476; City of Hollywood v. Peck, Fla.1952, 57 So.2d 842; Laytner v. State, Fla.App.1970, 239 So.2d 857; State v. Harris, Fla.1962, 136 So.2d 633. The question presented to us is one which the trial court has the power to adjudicate and *773which may be reviewed on appeal; furthermore, this court’s determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the case.
REED, C. J., and WALDEN and MA-GER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Iorio v. State, 297 So. 2d 116 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974)…52, 57 So. 2d 842. The question presented is one which the trial court has the power to adjudicate and is reviewable on appeal; furthermore, this court’s determination would not necessarily be dispositive of the cause. State v. Kanter, Fla.App.1973, 273 So. 2d 772; State v. Brooks, Fla.App.1972, 269 So. 2d 23; In re Adoption of Taylor, Fla.App.1964, 166 So. 2d 476; cf. United States v. Gaines, 5 Cir. 1974, 489 F. 2d 690. Certified question denied. CROSS and MAGER, JJ., and ANDERSON, ALLEN C., Associate Judg…
-
State v. Gutierrez, 330 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…fied questions, and the holding in Moeller v. Doe, Fla.App.1975, 309 So. 2d 611, we decline to answer the certified question propounded to us by the circuit court. See Iorio v. State, Fla.App. 1974, 297 So. 2d 116; and State v. Kanter, Fla.App.1973, 273 So. 2d 772. Certified question denied.…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Harris, 136 So. 2d 633 (Fla. 1962)
- Boyer v. City OF Orlando, 232 So. 2d 169 (Fla. 1970)
- Laytner v. State, 239 So. 2d 857 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
- The First Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. v. Great Am. Ins. Co., 257 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972)
- In re Est. of Louise Thourez v. Palmer First Nat'l Bank & Tr. Co. OF Sarasota, 166 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
- In re Adoption by Benny J. Taylor and Maxine C. Taylor, 166 So. 2d 476 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)