ST. JOE PAPER COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

CURTIS JOHNSON, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Gorman Roberts, Jr. v. State, 874 So. 2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)
  …ation as well. See Ramirez v. State, 739 So. 2d 568 (Fla.1999); Sapp v. State, 690 So. 2d 581, 583-84 (Fla.1997); Holland v. State, 813 So. 2d 1007, 1009 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002); T.S.D. v. State, 741 So. 2d 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999); Statewright v. State, 278 So. 2d 652 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973); James v. State, 223 So. 2d 52 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969). Similarly, federal courts have recognized that advisement of the right to counsel during questioning is a vital part of the Miranda procedural safeguards. See United States v.…
• State v. Statewright, 300 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 1974)
  …Retired), Justice: We issued a writ of certiorari in this cause, and heard oral argument, based upon an asserted conflict between the decision sought to be reviewed and State v. Craig, 237 So. 2d 737 (Fla.1970). In the case sub judice, reported at 278 So. 2d 652, the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reversed on two grounds appellee’s conviction of first degree murder. One of these grounds was that the admission into evidence of oral and written statements made by the appellee was error, since the…
• Rodriguez v. State, 287 So. 2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973)
  …him during interrogation under the system for protecting the privilege we delineate today.” (384 U.S. at p. 471, 86 S.Ct. at p. 1626, 16 L.Ed.2d at p. 722; see also Woods v. State, Fla.App. 1968, 211 So. 2d 248; Statewright v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 278 So. 2d 652.) [Emphasis supplied.] Based on the record before us, we cannot conclude that the state has met its [*397] heavy burden to establish that the appellant was clearly informed of his right to counsel and that he knowingly and intelligently waived his…