ARSENIO GARCIA, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the admission of testimony regarding the defendant's prior burglaries, while potentially excessive, was harmless error given other strong evidence of guilt.
[1] Evidence of prior similar offenses is admissible to prove intent when it is relevant and not unduly prejudicial.
[2] Testimony regarding a defendant's prior admissions of guilt for numerous similar offenses is admissible if relevant to the element of intent.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe appellant was convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit grand larceny. The state introduced testimony from police office…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Intent To Commit A Felony cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant and another man were followed by a number of police officers, and were seen to approach a motel, and break and enter a room thereof, for which the appellant was charged, tried by a jury and convicted of breaking and entering a dwelling with intent to commit a felony, to-wit: grand larceny. The other man, convicted earlier, testified at the trial of the appellant that they entered the motel room with the alleged intent. The defendant did not testify or present evidence on his own behalf.
• Appellant contended the trial court committed error by admitting, over objection, the testimony of two of the police officers that (after having been warned of his rights following arrest) the defendant stated to them he had burglarized 4,010 motel rooms, and further that the court erred by permitting the prosecutor to refer to such testimony in argument. The appellant does not contend that such evidence was not relevant on the issue relating to intent to commit grand larceny, but argues such evidence was so excessive in that regard as to prejudice the jury against the defendant and deprive him of a fair trial.
The challenged testimony, as to the admission by the defendant of commission of a great number of offenses of the kind charged here, while relevant to the element of intent, was not alone relied on by the state to prove intent. It was cumulative to direct evidence as to that element of the charged offense that was supplied by the other participant, whose testimony relating to intent was unanswered and uncontra-dicted. The testimony was admissible because of its relevancy. Williams v. State, Fla. 1959, 110 So.2d 654. In face of the strong proof of guilt by other evidence which was uncontradicted, the error if any in that regard was harmless, and as such not basis for reversal here. § 924.33 Fla. Stat., F.S.A. See Williams v. State, Fla.App.1970, 233 So.2d 428; State v. Wilson, Fla.1973, 276 So.2d 45; Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250, 89 S.Ct. 1726, 23 L.Ed.2d 284.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Holley Curtis Taylor v. State, 289 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)…cted evidence of guilt of the offense of possession of the drugs was such that the disclosure in evidence of the status of the defendant as an inmate of the prison camp, was harmless error, not basis for reversal. See Garcia v. State, Fla.App. 1973, 278 So. 2d 678 and cases cited there. No reversible error having been shown, the judgment is affirmed.…
-
Arsenio Garcia v. State, 285 So. 2d 21 (Fla. 1973)…Certiorari denied. 278 So. 2d 678. CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS and DEKLE, JJ., concur.…
-
City OF Miami v. Fla. E. Coast Ry. Co., 285 So. 2d 415 (Fla. 1973)…Certiorari denied. 278 So. 2d 678. CARLTON, C. J., and BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur. ERVIN, J., dissents.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Harrington v. California, 395 U.S. 250 (U.S. 1969)
- Williams v. State, 110 So. 2d 654 (Fla. 1959)
- State v. Wilson, 276 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 1973)
- Williams v. State, 233 So. 2d 428 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)