BERMAN LEASING COMPANY, A DIVISION OF BERMAC CORP., A PENNSYLVANIA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MIAMI AUTO RADIATOR, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Open Account cases and more on FLexlaw
Appellant plaintiff seeks review of the amount of a final judgment entered in its favor on a complaint for an open account, *493account stated and for goods supplied and delivered contending the insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the trial court’s grant of a set-off to the appellee-defend-ant.
We have carefully considered the briefs and arguments of counsel, and based upon the record as it appears before us1 we have concluded that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error on the part of the trial judge. Therefore, the final judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed in all respects.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Emmitt v. McWHIRTER, 325 So. 2d 463 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976)…e stole the cards, McWhirter could not be convicted of a charge that he “did buy, receive or aid in the concealment” of them. Johnson v. State, 226 So. 2d 884 (Fla.App.2d, 1969); Ketelsen v. State, 211 So. 2d 853 (Fla.App. 3d, 1968); E. C. v. State, 280 So. 2d 492 (Fla.App.3d, 1973). But if, as Mc-Whirter’s evidence implies, Rusty stole the cards while McWhirter danced with the victim, McWhirter could be convicted if the jury believed also that McWhirter was “a confederate of the actual thief who was present…
-
Godby v. State, 334 So. 2d 660 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)…[*661] PER CURIAM. This judgment of conviction of receiving stolen property is reversed on authority of Ketelsen v. State, 211 So. 2d 853 (Fla.App. 3d 1968); Thomas v. State, 216 So. 2d 25 (Fla.App. 3rd 1968); and E. C. v. State, 280 So. 2d 492 (Fla.App. 3rd 1973), and the cause is remanded with directions to discharge the appellant from custody. REVERSED and REMANDED with directions. WALDEN, C. J., DOWNEY, J., and MORROW, RUSSELL O., Associate Judge, concur.…
-
S. W. P. v. State, 354 So. 2d 414 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978)…principal to the theft cannot be convicted of receiving, retaining, disposing or aiding in the concealment of stolen property. See Ketelsen v. State, 211 So. 2d 853 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); Thomas v. State, 216 So. 2d 25 (Fla.3d DCA 1968); E. C. v. State, 280 So. 2d 492 (Fla.3d DCA 1973); McWhirter v. State, 325 So. 2d 463 (Fla.1st DCA 1976); C. M. I. and A. R. v. State, 335 So. 2d 868 (Fla.3d DCA 1976). Reversed.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Carthel James Rushing v. State, 233 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)