LINDSLEY LUMBER AND INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
v.
JAMES THOMAS AND THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
LINDSLEY LUMBER AND INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONERS,
JAMES THOMAS AND THE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS
281 So. 2d 193
Florida Supreme Court (1973)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
By petition for writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Industrial Relations Commission February 9, 1973.
After oral argument and upon consideration of the petition, the briefs and the record, it is our judgment that the Industrial Relations Commission was correct in concluding that claimant’s attorney rendered beneficial services on claimant’s behalf and was therefore entitled to an attorney’s fee pursuant to Fla.Stat. § 440.34, F.S.A. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.
It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J., and ERVIN, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
G & S Packing Co. & Fla. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. Driggers, 382 So. 2d 446 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)…hould award a fee for the effort of claimant’s attorney in securing this benefit. Osteen v. Georgia-Pacific Corp., IRC Order 2-3383 (March 24, 1978), cert, denied, 367 So. 2d 1123 (Fla.1979); Thomas v. Lindsiey Lumber, 8 FCR 52 (1973), cert, denied, 281 So. 2d 193 (1973). Although the deputy commissioner merely found entitlement to a fee, without an award of any specific amount, the effect of his findings is to predicate the fee only upon the attorney’s services regarding the “change of physician” issue. Cla…
-
State v. Escobedo, 404 So. 2d 760 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…f forgery under the above statute. First, there must be “ ‘the making of a writing which falsely purports to be the writing of another.’ ” Green v. State, 76 So. 2d at 647; see also Rapp v. State, 274 So. 2d 18, 19 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. discharged, 281 So. 2d 193 (Fla.1973); Davis v. State, 111 So. 2d 459, 461 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959). Central to this element is that the writing in its entirety must falsely purport to be the genuine writing of a third person — someone other than the accused— whether that third pe…
-
State v. Charles, 341 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)…ports to be the writing of another, with intent to defraud. The crime may exist even though the name is fictitious when it is shown that the fictitious name was used with an intent to defraud. Green v. State, 76 So. 2d 645 (Fla.1954); State v. Rapp, 281 So. 2d 193 (Fla.1973). Clearly, an endorsement supplied to a check drawn on a bank may constitute forgery. Smith v. State, 59 So. 2d 625 (Fla.1952); Hazen v. Mayo, 90 So. 2d 123 (Fla.1956). Where the name actually signed resembles a true name, the texts indic…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence