HARVEY BRUCE ROBERTS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1973-08-09
No. T-268
RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
281 So. 2d 219 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1973) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

RAWLS, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Roberts v. State, 292 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
    …een repeatedly considered by this court. See Roberts v. Wainwright, Fla.App. 1st 1971, 251 So. 2d 157; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 265 So. 2d 431; Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1972, 266 So. 2d 421; and Roberts v. State, Fla.App. 1st 1973, 281 So. 2d 219. We have carefully examined the record on appeal and the briefs submitted by both the appellant and the appellee and find that the appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. Therefore, the order appealed from be and it is hereby affirme…
  • Roberts v. State, 521 So. 2d 289 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
    …in this court, which per curiam affirmed. Roberts v. State, 266 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 1st DCA 1972). He then filed a Rule 3.850 motion, raising a speedy trial issue. The trial court denied the motion, and this court per curiam affirmed. Roberts v. State, 281 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). He filed a second Rule 3.850 motion, raising the issues of illegal consecutive sentences and ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied that motion, and this court per curiam affirmed. Roberts v. State, 292 So. 2d…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw