JESSIE BANNERMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
LOUIE L. WAINWRIGHT, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellant Bannerman appealed his guilty plea conviction for manslaughter, but the court reporter's transcript was lost. The court held that appellate review is a constitutional right that need not depend on a verbatim transcript, and remanded for reconstruction of the proceedings through narrative statement.
The right to appellate review of a criminal conviction is guaranteed by the state constitution and cannot be defeated by loss of the verbatim transcript. A reconstructed narrative statement prepared from counsel's notes, the judge's notes, and recollections of the participants, as may be agreed upon by the parties and the trial judge, constitutes a sufficient record for appellate review.
[1] The right to appellate review of a criminal conviction is a necessary component of due process guaranteed by the Constitution.
[2] Appellate review is not contingent upon the availability of a verbatim transcript; a narrative statement can suffice if it accurately reflects the proceedings.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The right of one convicted of a criminal offense to an appellate review of the judgment of conviction is a necessary ingredient of due process of law and is guaranteed by the Constitution of this State.”
Establishes that appellate review is a constitutional right that cannot be forfeited due to loss of transcript
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBannerman pleaded guilty to manslaughter in October 1969. The court reporter's notes for June through December 1969 were lost or destroyed. Appellant …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reconstruction Of Record cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This Court granted appellant a belated appeal from his judgment of conviction for manslaughter, which was entered pursuant to a plea of guilty. It is now contended that appellant is unable to pursue the appeal because argument on the points involved cannot be made without the court reporter’s transcript of the proceedings below. It appears from the record that all notes for the year 1969, June through December, were lost or destroyed. Appellant’s guilty plea was accepted and judgment rendered thereon in October of 1969.
The right of one convicted of a criminal offense to an appellate review of the judgment of conviction is a necessary ingredient of due process of law and is guaranteed by the Constitution of this State. Simmons v. State, 200 So. 2d 619 (Fla.App. 1st, 1969). It affirmatively appears from the assignments of error filed by appellant that the points sought to be raised cannot be properly considered without some account of the actual proceedings regarding the acceptance of appellant’s plea of guilty. However, as noted in numerous cases:
“It is not a necessary prerequisite to appellate review that the record on appeal contain a verbatim transcript of the evidence and events transpiring at the trial. On the contrary, a summarized statement in narrative form may furnish a substantially accurate account of the rulings of the trial judge and the basis on which they were invoked. Such statement may be prepared from notes kept by counsel; from the judge’s notes; from the recollection of counsel, the judge and witnesses as to what occurred at the trial; and from any and all sources which will contribute to an accurate reflection of the trial proceedings. We also point out that Rule 6.7, subd. f, Florida Appellate Rules 31 F.S.A., provides that the parties may agree upon a condensed statement in narrative form of all or any part of the testimony.” Thomas v. State, 160 So. 2d 119 (Fla.App. 2nd, 1964).
Also see Davis v. State, 205 So. 2d 684 (Fla.App. 1st, 1968); Rushing v. State, 233 So. 2d 137 (Fla.App. 3rd, 1970) and Yancey v. State, 267 So. 2d 836 (Fla.App. 4th, 1972).
Accordingly, having found that appellant is entitled to a full review of the proceedings had in the trial court, we temporarily relinquish jurisdiction to the trial court for a period of 30 days with instructions that a determined effort be made by counsel and the court to reconstruct, within the limits of reasonable accuracy, the proceedings surrounding the making and acceptance of the appellant’s guilty plea. Within said thirty days, a reconstructed record or narrative statement of the proceedings should be filed with the Clerk of this Court. Said statement should contain matters as may be agreed upon by the appellant, through the public defender appointed to represent appellant in this appeal, and the state attorney, and the trial judge should add any additional matter of which he may have knowledge in order that such total statement may, as accurately as possible, reflect the proceedings below. Based upon that submitted record, the appellant may then continue to pursue his appeal.
The matter is therefore remanded for further proceedings in compliance with this opinion.
It is so ordered.
WIGGINTON, Acting C, J., and JOHNSON and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hamilton v. State, 573 So. 2d 109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…although indigence of the criminal appellant required it. The effect of premature dismissal of petitioner’s appeal was to deprive him of his constitutional due process right to appellate review of his criminal conviction. See Bannerman v. Wainwright 283 So. 2d 124, 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973); Simmons v. State, 200 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967). Except by certiorari, petitioner has no remedy available to overcome this departure from an essential principle of law, which if uncorrected amounts to a miscarriage of…
-
Heriberto Garcia v. State, 578 So. 2d 325 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…he trial judge and the basis on which they were involved. Such statement may be prepared from notes kept by counsel; from the judge’s notes; from the recollection of counsel; the judge and witnesses as to what occurred. ... Bannerman v. Wainwright, 283 So. 2d 124, 125 (Fla. 1st DCA 1973). The trial judge’s affidavit and the attached document with his notes constituted a record of the hearing. Garcia relies on Lucero v. State, 564 So. 2d 158 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (appellate court had no basis to decide appeal if…
-
Bannerman v. State, 287 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)…PER CURIAM. Appellant seeks reversal of his judgment of conviction for manslaughter, which was entered pursuant to a plea of guilty. We previously relinquished jurisdiction of this cause (Fla.App., 283 So. 2d 124) to the trial court for the purpose of reconstructing the proceedings surrounding the making and acceptance of appellant’s guilty plea. We have now received and examined the reconstructed account of the proceedings below, as signed by the trial jud…
Authorities Cited
- Elbert Quinton Yancey v. State, 267 So. 2d 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972)
- Harris v. Jewett, 200 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
- Simmons v. State, 200 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)
- Thomas v. State, 160 So. 2d 119 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964)
- Carthel James Rushing v. State, 233 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
- Davis v. State, 205 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1st DCA 1967)