PAUL EUGENE CUMMINGS, APPELLANT,
v.
DOROTHY JUNE CUMMINGS, APPELLEE
GRIMES, Judge.
The judgment is hereby modified to the extent that the attorney’s fee to be awarded appellee’s attorney for services below is set at $350.00 according to the prior stipulation of the parties. The reference to costs which appears in the judgment shall be deleted, without prejudice to the right of the appellee to file a motion to tax costs in the lower court.
Nothing herein shall prevent the appellant from seeking an order under F.R.C.P. 1.540, 31 F.S.A., whereby the party who received property as a result of the divorce would be declared primarily liable, as between the parties, for debts which are secured by liens on that property.
Except as noted above, the judgment is affirmed.
MANN, C. J., and NANCE, L. CLAYTON, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cummings v. Cummings, 330 So. 2d 134 (Fla. 1976)…BOYD, Justice. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Second District, reported at 287 So. 2d 368. Our jurisdiction is based upon conflict1 between the decision sought to be reviewed and Gordon v. Gordon;2 Steinhauer v. Steinhauer, Farrow v. Farrow,4 Thigpen v. Thigpen, inter alia. The facts of the case are as follows: Respondent-wife sought…
-
Hardrick v. State, 293 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)…and entering with intent to commit a felony precludes the additional imposition of a maximum sentence for grand larceny shown as proof of felonious intent. See also Baggett v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 287 So. 2d 336; Gelis v. State, Fla.App.2d 1973, 287 So. 2d 368; Nettles v. State, Fla.App.2d 1974, 293 So. 2d 378. Accordingly, this cause is remanded to the trial court with directions to vacate the sentence on the lesser offense of grand larceny. The order appealed is affirmed in all other respects. McNULT…
-
Cooper v. State, 379 So. 2d 199 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)….Ct. 2018, 26 L.Ed.2d 586 (1970). “[I]t is the excess of total imprisonment over the statutory maximum with which the courts are concerned.” Matthews v. Dees, supra at 931; see also Wilson v. State, 358 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Gelis v. State, 287 So. 2d 368, 369 (Fla. 2d DCA 1973). We hold that the summary denial of Cooper’s petition for postconviction relief was erroneous. Accordingly, the order denying hearing is vacated and this cause is [*201] remanded with directions that the trial court, within…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence