EARL DURHAM, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Cuciak v. State, 410 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 1982)
  …ditional information in order to properly prepare a defense to the charges, the various methods of discovery under our rules are available to him.” This decision has been followed in Coby v. State, 397 So. 2d 974 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Suarez v. State, 377 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); [*918] and Cioeta v. State, 367 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979). Fair play and justice require that a defendant in a probation revocation hearing be entitled to reasonable discovery pursuant to rule 3.220. The framers of rule 3.22…
• Cuciak v. State, 394 So. 2d 500 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …nse to the charges, the various methods of discovery under our rules are available to him. Although this language was dictum, we cannot disregard it or the various cases dealing with discovery in violation of probation matters. See Suarez v. State, 377 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Cioeta v. State, 367 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); and Sukert v. State, 325 So. 2d 439 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). With great reluctance, we conclude the language from Hines requires we rule that a defendant is entitled to discovery in…

Authorities Cited

• Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188 (U.S. 1972)
• Marden v. State, 203 So. 2d 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)
• Hamilton v. State, 356 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
• Parrish v. State, 366 So. 2d 530 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
• Juice Specialists, Inc. v. Conner, 210 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 1968)
• Myers v. Seaboard Air Line R.R. Co., 210 So. 2d 224 (Fla. 1968)