THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
NICK E. STAMATHIS, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Bar's petition for approval of a conditional guilty plea against attorney Nick E. Stamathis was approved, resulting in an 89-day suspension, cost assessment, and three-year probation with quarterly reporting requirements.
The Court approved the conditional guilty plea and imposed an 89-day suspension, costs of $348.20, and three-year probation with quarterly reporting requirements.
[1] A conditional guilty plea in attorney disciplinary proceedings may be approved by the Supreme Court subject to agreed-upon disciplinary sanctions including suspension, co…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA formal complaint was filed against respondent attorney by The Florida Bar on August 21, 1973. Respondent tendered a conditional guilty plea subject …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Suspension cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on the Petition of The Florida Bar for approval of a conditional guilty plea and entry of final order of discipline.
A formal complaint was filed against respondent by The Florida Bar on August 21, 1973. Subsequently, pursuant to the provisions of Integration Rule 11.-13(6) (b), 32 F.S.A., respondent tendered a conditional guilty plea subject to approval by the Supreme Court in exchange for the imposition of an 89 day suspension, taxation of costs and probation for a three year period which probation would consist of quarterly reports filed with the Clerk of the Supreme Court with a copy to Staff Counsel for The Florida Bar. The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar accepted the conditional guilty plea in November, 1973, subject to the approval by this Court.
We hereby approve the conditional guilty plea and respondent is hereby suspended to and including May 20, 1974, and he is directed to file quarterly reports with the Clerk and' a copy to Staff Counsel for The Florida Bar, and execution is hereby directed to issue for the costs against respondent in the amount of $348.20. The respondent may continue to work on pending cases which are listed on an inventory of pending cases to be filed by the respondent with the Clerk of the Supreme Court of Florida, Bar Counsel and Staff Counsel within 20 days after the date of this order. It is so ordered.
CARLTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ERVIN, ADKINS, BOYD, McCAIN and DEKLE, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (12 total)
-
Christine Thomas, M.D. v. Osler Med., Inc., 963 So. 2d 896 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007)…evi-dentiary hearing,2 the appellate court is constrained to review only the legal sufficiency of the order, the complaint, and any supporting documents. Hotel-Motel, Rest. Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 339 v. Black Angus of Lauderhill, Inc., 290 So. 2d 479, 482 (Fla.1974) (“[A] defendant may take an interlocutory appeal from an order issuing a temporary injunction without notice and seek review of the legal sufficiency of the complaint and supporting affidavits. The appellate court may not review the…
-
United Farm Workers OF Am., AFL-CIO v. Quincy Corp., 681 So. 2d 773 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…elects not to seek dissolution of the injunction under Rule 1.610(d), does not permit an inquiry into the factual matters presented in the underlying case. See, Hotel-Motel Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union v. Black Angus of Lauderhill, Inc., 290 So. 2d 479 (Fla.1974). However, the lower court’s compliance with the requirements of law when issuing an injunction is a matter within the purview of a reviewing court. See, City of Jacksonville v. Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co., 634 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 1st DCA…
-
Acquafredda v. Messina, 408 So. 2d 828 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)…t it will, nevertheless, review the legal sufficiency of the complaint and supporting affidavits which form the basis for its entry. Hotel-Motel Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 339 of Broward County v. Black Angus of Lauderhill, Inc., 290 So. 2d 479 (Fla.1974). See also, Northwestern National Insurance Co. v. Greenspun, 330 So. 2d 561 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). No temporary injunction may be issued where the complaint upon which it is based sets out no ground for equitable relief. Blume v. Giles, 143…
Previewing 3 of 12 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence