RONNIE JAMES, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This court has carefully considered the record and the briefs of counsel and, on the authority of North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 91 S.Ct. 160, 27 L.Ed.2d 162 (1970), we find that the trial court properly accepted the defendant’s plea of guilty. See also Estes v. State, Fla.App. (1st) 1974, 294 So. 2d 122. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is
Affirmed.
RAWLS, C. J., and BOYER, J., concur. McCORD, J., concurring specially.
McCORD, Judge
(concurring specially).
From the record it is clear that appellant’s plea of guilty to the charge of aggravated assault in this cause was the result of a negotiated plea wherein the state nolle prossed two additional cases against defendant, each charging breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny. I agree with affirmance on authority of Estes v. State cited in main opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Lachadvos Jermel Daniels, 158 So. 3d 629 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014)…intersection. We have little doubt that section 316.128(2), like other traffic safety laws, has as its primary purpose the preservation of the lives and safety of those.who use the highways. See Chaitkin v. Dep’t of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles, 294 So. 2d 352, 354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). This Court has previously held that when a vehicle “pulled beyond or ahead of the stop line,” a traffic infraction has occurred under section 316.123(2)(a), and a valid traffic stop may result. Robinson, 756 So. 2d at 250.…
Authorities Cited
- North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (U.S. 1970)
- Estes v. State, 294 So. 2d 122 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)