GOODALL RUBBER COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

EASTERN CEMENT CORPORATION, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Knealing v. Puleo, 675 So. 2d 593 (Fla. 1996)
  …vil Procedure 1.442. A statute providing authority to award fees must do so expressly. See Dorner v. Red Top Cab & Baggage Co., 160 Fla. 882, 37 So. 2d 160 (1948); Florida Life Ins. Co. v. Fickes, 613 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993); Scott v. Scott, 303 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Contrary to the district court’s finding in Puleo, section 44.102(6) does not expressly authorize an award of fees simply by referencing section 768.79. Nor does it provide any other independent basis for awarding fees. Rather…
• Cladis v. Cladis, 512 So. 2d 271 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
  …pinion that the contract terms under which the wife waived any claim to the [*275] husband’s property are valid and that, not having waived other of her claims such as support and alimony, she is now free to maintain such claims. See Scott v. Scott, 303 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); Topper v. Stewart, 449 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); Posner v. Posner, 237 So. 2d 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). In our opinion the remaining appellate points do not merit discussion. There is one final caution that we mention for c…
• Adler v. Etta Mae Adler and Joan Berk, 365 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
  …he attorney’s fees were not within any statutory entitlement and the parties did not agree to this payment. Accordingly, the attorney’s fees were improperly awarded. See, e. g., Fisher v. Fisher, 318 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975; and Scott v. Scott, 303 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974). Affirmed in part; reversed in part.…