ANDRE C. SASSER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Indigent Defendants cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This court, proceeding in the manner outlined and recommended by the Supreme Court of the United States in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, having deferred ruling on a motion of the public defender to withdraw as counsel for the indigent defendant-appellant, and having furnished appellant with a copy of the public defender’s memorandum brief, and having allowed the appellant a reasonable specified time within which to raise any points that he chose in support of his appeal, and the appellant having failed to respond thereto, on consideration thereof upon full examination of the proceedings we conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous. Whereupon, the public defender’s said motion to withdraw is granted, and the order or judgment appealed is hereby affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Frierson v. State, 339 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…prejudicial comment made by the prosecutor in closing argument. As a general rule, a considerable degree of latitude is allowed prosecutors in closing argument to the jury, and logical inferences from the evidence are permissible. Wilson v. State, 305 So. 2d 50, 52 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974); Thomas v. State, 326 So. 2d 413, 415 (Fla.1975), and cases cited therein. Accord: Johnsen v. State, 332 So. 2d 69 (Fla.1976). Each case involving an alleged inflammatory or abusive remark by the prosecutor must be considered…
-
Deliford v. State, 505 So. 2d 523 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…e, 363 So. 2d 331, 334-35 (Fla.1978), and, (b) the complained-of argument was entirely proper in any event. See Francis v. State, 384 So. 2d 967, 968-69 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Delaney v. State, 342 So. 2d 1098, 1099 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Wilson v. State, 305 So. 2d 50, 52 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Third, we accept the state’s concession that the defendant’s sentencing point has merit. The Florida Supreme Court has held, subsequent to the imposition of sentence below, that habitual offender status of a defendant is no…
-
Strozier v. State, 327 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed: See: Watson v. State, Fla. 1966, 190 So. 2d 161; Wilson v. State, Fla. App.1974, 305 So. 2d 50; Lebowitz v. State, Fla.App.1975, 313 So. 2d 473; § 924.33, Fla.Stat.…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)