CHARLES LEE STROZIER, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Kimbrough v. State, 356 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
  …lty of two lesser included offenses of grand larceny which were part of higher robbery offenses for which defendant was also convicted. See also Sloan v. State, 323 So. 2d 278 (Fla.2d DCA 1975) (assault merged into robbery). In Heisterman v. State, 327 So. 2d 839 (Fla.3d DCA 1976), the defendant committed only one criminal act in shooting into the occupied dwelling and the court, holding that only the assault with intent to commit murder would be upheld, reversed the conviction for shooting into the dwelling…
• Hegstrom v. State, 388 So. 2d 1308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …s were in silent disarray. Corn-pare Ennis v. State, 364 So. 2d 497 (Fla. 2dDCA 1978); Hernandez v. State, 278 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 2dDCA 1973); Yost v. State, 243 So. 2d 469 (Fla. 3dDCA 1971) (setting aside the sentence only), with Heisterman v. State, 327 So. 2d 839 (Fla. 3dDCA 1976); and Sloan v. State, 323 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 2dDCA 1975) (setting aside the judgment). Only Kimbrough v. State, 356 So. 2d 1294 (Fla. 4thDCA 1978), and, to a lesser extent, Taylor v. State, 330 So. 2d 44 (Fla. IstDCA 1976), openly add…
• State v. Heisterman, 343 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1977)
  …We here review the decision of the Third District Court of Appeal, reported at 327 So. 2d 839, insofar as it holds that-respondent was improperly convicted and sentenced for two separate offenses because “the facts proved [at trial constitute] only one criminal act . .”1 The respondent was convicted and sentenced for shooting a gun into an…

Authorities Cited

• Watson v. State, 190 So. 2d 161 (Fla. 1966)
• Lebowitz v. State, 313 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
• Sasser v. State, 305 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
• Wilson v. State, 305 So. 2d 50 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)