FLORA W. WARREN, APPELLANT,
v.
THOMAS EDWIN WARREN, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Retroactive Child Support cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
We have carefully examined the record and briefs in this case and find that appellant has failed to demonstrate error. As to appellant’s contention that the trial judge erred in failing to order appellee to pay retroactive support for the child of the parties prior to the filing of any pleading seeking such support, appellant relies on Weinstein v. Weinstein, Fla. App.3rd 1963, 148 So. 2d 737. We note that our sister court of the Third District there cited a Texas Appellate Court decision. Such does not comport with our understanding of the law of Florida and no other statutory nor case authority has been called to our attention, nor has independent research revealed any.
As to appellant’s claim that the trial judge erred in refusing to order support for the child of the parties after that child reached age 18, being then legally an adult and not incompetent, we affirm on authority of White v. White, Fla.App.1st 1974, 296 So. 2d 619.
Affirmed.
BOYER, Acting C. J., JOHNSON, J., and EASTMORE, E. L., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Variety Child's. Hosp., Inc. v. Vigliotti, 385 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)…dical service. . The record does not indicate whether the mother was present at the time of the child’s admission. .The distinction made in Weinstein v. Weinstein, 148 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), questioned on other grounds in Warren v. Warren, 306 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974), and argued by Mrs. Vigliotti is not applicable in this case. That argument, that an intervening third party will not be compensated on a quasi-contract theory unless the parent “failed or refused” to fulfill her obligation, is s…
-
Krogen v. Krogen, 320 So. 2d 483 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)…upon reaching the age of majority. Perla v. Perla, Fla.1952, 58 So. 2d 689; Fincham v. Levin, Fla.App.1963, 155 So. 2d 883; White v. White, Fla.App.1974, 296 So. 2d 619; French v. French, Fla.App.1974, 303 So. 2d 668; Warren v. Warren, Fla.App.1974, 306 So. 2d 197; Robertson v. Robertson, Fla.App.1975, 312 So. 2d 246; Kowalski v. Kowalski, Fla.App.1975, 315 So. 2d 497. We are particularly impressed by the language used by Judge Boyer in White v. White, supra, wherein the following is found: % * * * * j|c “[…
-
Fagan v. Maude Fagan, 381 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)…ony before the Court indicated he would have to continue living in her home, indefinitely, because of mental problems. Appellant first argues that the trial court erred because the award of arrearages was “retroactive”, relying on Warren v. Warren, 306 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Because of our view of the original Judgment, we do not consider the award of arrearages “retroactive” in this case. Further, the record does not demonstrate any error in the calculation of the arrearages. Appellant argues that…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Houston R. White v. White, 296 So. 2d 619 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974)
- Weinstein v. Doreene Weinstein, 148 So. 2d 737 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963)